Re: Some UK aviation stats for July 2008
Von: David Kerr (david.kerr@lineone.net) [Profil]
Datum: 10.09.2008 23:47
Message-ID: <0066fba9-29ba-400b-97cc-e6a311a58c79@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.airports.uk.edinburgh
Datum: 10.09.2008 23:47
Message-ID: <0066fba9-29ba-400b-97cc-e6a311a58c79@y21g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.airports.uk.edinburgh
On Sep 10, 11:38 am, Joe Curry <jcurr...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 9 Sep 2008 23:49:56 +0100, "Clive" > > <clivebra...@nospamorange.net> wrote: > >Nice to see GLA in LCY's top ten, especially as some folk (mainly in aau g) > >thought it would never work because it's come and gone previously. > > And about to go again eventually? > > -- > Exactly why would you want GLA-LCY to be pulled? It shouldn't really impact on the EDI service. Unless the folks on the EDI service are finding GLA more convenient? To paraphrase Kevin Keegan: I'd love it if EDI-LCY were to be pulled, absolutely love it.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Yusuf (10.09.2008 23:51)
- David Kerr (11.09.2008 00:17)
- jcurry99@googlemail.com (11.09.2008 11:05)
- David Kerr (11.09.2008 14:36)
- jcurry99@googlemail.com (11.09.2008 11:38)
- jcurry99@googlemail.com (11.09.2008 11:25)