nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: The ugliest car ever made?

Von: Hachiroku ???? (trueno@e86.gts) [Profil]
Datum: 13.01.2010 23:21
Message-ID: <pan.2010.01.13.22.21.39.763939@e86.GTS>
Newsgroup: alt.autos.toyota alt.autos.pontiac alt.cars alt.autos
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 19:43:29 -0500, tww1491 wrote:

>
> "Mike Hunter" <Mikehunt2@lycos,com> wrote in message
> news:4b4df272$0$7749$ce5e7886@news-radius.ptd.net...
>> They should do a survey of the Ugliest car manufacturer, Toyota would
>> will hands down    LOL
> I don't know -- the Acura TL is a doozy.


"doozy" implies it's a Deusenberg. They went belly up in 1937...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Duesenberg


>
>
>>
>> "chronicle" <rca976@live.com> wrote in message
>> news:a4e44c5e-a999-4ae4-be25-04c2e40d297d@o28g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
>> x-no-archive:yes
>> On Jan 12, 7:57 am, Dur <Use-Author-Supplied-Address-Header@[127.1]>
>> wrote:
>>> (Car Lust) - Some cars are beautiful, and some ... well, not to put too
>>> fine a point on it, some cars are not beautiful. The proportions are
>>> off, or the detailing is overwrought, or a prominent design element
>>> clashes with the rest of the styling, or it's bland and boring, or
>>> something's just ... not quite right.
>>>
>>> And then there are those select few that are total aesthetic disasters.
>>> Not just ugly, but dog ugly. Butt ugly.
>>> Warthog-beaten-with-an-ugly-stick ugly. Cars it hurts just to look at.
>>>
>>> Today's subject is such a car. It was voted "the ugliest car ever
made"
>>> by the readers of CarData, Whether that's exactly right or wrong--I can
>>> think of a few other contenders for that dubious honor--this car is
>>> nevertheless one whose body panels insult the very steel they were
>>> stamped out of. Continue reading only if you be men and women of valor,
>>> for the styling of this automobile is so just plain wrong that it would
>>> make even an Aztek owner recoil in horror...
>>>
>>> Continued: http://xrl.us/UgliestCar
>>
>> Nothing was uglier than the Aztek.
>>
>>
>>


[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]