• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Illiberal liberalism

Robert Miller wrote:
> "mrmcafee" <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote in message
> news:3%XJi.80897$xZ2.5857@newsfe10.phx...
>>
>> Robert Miller wrote:
>>> "Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" <revbob@the.rectory> wrote in
message
>>> news:Xns99AD9E823E638revbob@140.99.99.130...
>>>> The kindly Rev. overheard metaluna <no@email.no> saying on Tue 04
>>>> Sep 2007 05:09:19p:
>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> MLK will never be spokesman for morality.
He was a sex pig.
>>>>>>>>>> What does sex have to do with morality?
>>>>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>>>>> Best explained by writing Ted Kennedy, Bill
Clinton, Jesse
>>>>>>>>> Jackson, Sen. Craig....
>>>>>>>> Yet more validation that, to a Real Right-Winger, Sex
Conquers
>>>>>>>> All.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Well, so long as you can come up with *some* excuse to
let you
>>>>>>>> keep that hate burning (and never, never look at the
real
>>>>>>>> reason you hate those people (with the exception of the
one you
>>>>>>>> tacked on at the very end)), you're good to go in the
local
>>>>>>>> Ditto Room. >>> The hypocrisy evident in this
unwarranted
>>>>>>>> attack is classic
>>>>>>> projection.
>>>>>> You haven't had much exposure to Smith29, have you?
>>>>>>
>>>>> I am referring to this purported Reverend's erratic behavior.
>>>> Sorry, Bubba, the question here isn't about supposeldoly
"eratic"
>>>> behavior, it's about your suppport for for Republican Party's program
>>>> of racism.
>>>>
>>> How much support did the Civil Rights Act get from Democrats compared
>>> to Republicans?
>> Quite a bit, if we are discussing the 1964 Bill which is the main one.
>> http://tinyurl.com/2x6fcr . You should notice that the only Southern
>> Democratic Senator to support the bill was a Democrat, and the only
>> Southern Republican Senator opposed it.
>>
> Cherry picking your facts?
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
> Vote totals
> Totals are in "Yes-No" format:
>
> The original House version: 290-130   (69%-31%)
> The Senate version: 73-27   (73%-27%)
> The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289-126   (70%-30%)
>
> By party
> The original House version:
> Democratic Party: 153-96   (61%-39%)
> Republican Party: 138-34   (80%-20%)
>
> The Senate version:
> Democratic Party: 46-22   (68%-32%)
> Republican Party: 27-6   (82%-18%)
>
> The Senate version, voted on by the House:
> Democratic Party: 153-91   (63%-37%)
> Republican Party: 136-35   (80%-20%)
>
> As you can see the Civil Rights Act had greater support by Republicans
> than by Democrats.

What I see is more Democrats voting for the bill that Republicans.

It is a mute point, by any count. Yesterday's Southern Democrats are
todays Southern Republicans. This, there can be no refute.


>
>>>  The problem as I see it is that the Republicans are much less
>>> socialistic/communistic than the Democrats.
>> What does this (erroneous) judgment have to do with racism?
>
> Do you even know what racism is?

Well let's see. I'm old and a Texan by birth and raising. Yes, I know
what racism is.


>>
>>>
>> --
>> *******************
>>  Michael R. McAfee
>>      Mesa, AZ
>> *******************
>
>

--
*******************
Michael R. McAfee
Mesa, AZ
*******************

Antworten