• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Illiberal liberalism

"mrmcafee" <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote in message
news:inZJi.109639$Vk6.36804@newsfe07.phx...
>
>
> Robert Miller wrote:
>> "mrmcafee" <"(mrmcafee)nospam"@cox.net> wrote in
message
>> news:3%XJi.80897$xZ2.5857@newsfe10.phx...
>>>
>>> Robert Miller wrote:
>>>> "Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" <revbob@the.rectory> wrote in
message
>>>> news:Xns99AD9E823E638revbob@140.99.99.130...
>>>>> The kindly Rev. overheard metaluna <no@email.no> saying on
Tue 04
>>>>> Sep 2007 05:09:19p:
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> MLK will never be spokesman for
morality. He was a sex pig.
>>>>>>>>>>> What does sex have to do with morality?
>>>>>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>>>>>> Best explained by writing Ted Kennedy, Bill
Clinton, Jesse
>>>>>>>>>> Jackson, Sen. Craig....
>>>>>>>>> Yet more validation that, to a Real Right-Winger,
Sex Conquers
>>>>>>>>> All.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Well, so long as you can come up with *some* excuse
to let you
>>>>>>>>> keep that hate burning (and never, never look at
the real
>>>>>>>>> reason you hate those people (with the exception of
the one you
>>>>>>>>> tacked on at the very end)), you're good to go in
the local
>>>>>>>>> Ditto Room. >>> The hypocrisy evident in
this unwarranted
>>>>>>>>> attack is classic
>>>>>>>> projection.
>>>>>>> You haven't had much exposure to Smith29, have you?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> I am referring to this purported Reverend's erratic behavior.
>>>>> Sorry, Bubba, the question here isn't about supposeldoly
"eratic"
>>>>> behavior, it's about your suppport for for Republican Party's
program
>>>>> of racism.
>>>>>
>>>> How much support did the Civil Rights Act get from Democrats compared
>>>> to Republicans?
>>> Quite a bit, if we are discussing the 1964 Bill which is the main one.
>>> http://tinyurl.com/2x6fcr . You should notice that the only Southern
>>> Democratic Senator to support the bill was a Democrat, and the only
>>> Southern Republican Senator opposed it.
>>>
>> Cherry picking your facts?
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civil_Rights_Act_of_1964
>> Vote totals
>> Totals are in "Yes-No" format:
>>
>> The original House version: 290-130   (69%-31%)
>> The Senate version: 73-27   (73%-27%)
>> The Senate version, as voted on by the House: 289-126   (70%-30%)
>>
>> By party
>> The original House version:
>> Democratic Party: 153-96   (61%-39%)
>> Republican Party: 138-34   (80%-20%)
>>
>> The Senate version:
>> Democratic Party: 46-22   (68%-32%)
>> Republican Party: 27-6   (82%-18%)
>>
>> The Senate version, voted on by the House:
>> Democratic Party: 153-91   (63%-37%)
>> Republican Party: 136-35   (80%-20%)
>>
>> As you can see the Civil Rights Act had greater support by Republicans
>> than by Democrats.
>
> What I see is more Democrats voting for the bill that Republicans.
>
> It is a mute point, by any count. Yesterday's Southern Democrats are
> todays Southern Republicans. This, there can be no refute.
>
>
There are very few real Republicans or Democrats in office today, but if
you understood the difference between a Republic or Democracy you'd
understand that already.
>>
>>>>  The problem as I see it is that the Republicans are much less
>>>> socialistic/communistic than the Democrats.
>>> What does this (erroneous) judgment have to do with racism?
>>
>> Do you even know what racism is?
>
> Well let's see. I'm old and a Texan by birth and raising. Yes, I know what
> racism is.
>
And what is racism?  Not that I don't believe you, but only about 1 person
in 20 actually knows what racism is when they use the word.  It is one of
the more misused we have today.

>
>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> *******************
>>>  Michael R. McAfee
>>>      Mesa, AZ
>>> *******************
>>
>>
>
> --
> *******************
>  Michael R. McAfee
>      Mesa, AZ
> *******************

Robert Miller

Antworten