• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Illiberal liberalism

Robert Miller wrote:
> "Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" <revbob@the.rectory> wrote in message
> news:Xns99AD9E823E638revbob@140.99.99.130...
>> The kindly Rev. overheard metaluna <no@email.no> saying on Tue 04
>> Sep 2007 05:09:19p:
>>
>>>>>>>>> MLK will never be spokesman for morality. He was a
sex pig.
>>>>>>>> What does sex have to do with morality?
>>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>>> Best explained by writing Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Jesse
>>>>>>> Jackson, Sen. Craig....
>>>>>> Yet more validation that, to a Real Right-Winger, Sex Conquers
>>>>>> All.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Well, so long as you can come up with *some* excuse to let you
>>>>>> keep that hate burning (and never, never look at the real
>>>>>> reason you hate those people (with the exception of the one you
>>>>>> tacked on at the very end)), you're good to go in the local
>>>>>> Ditto Room. >>> The hypocrisy evident in this
unwarranted
>>>>>> attack is classic
>>>>> projection.
>>>> You haven't had much exposure to Smith29, have you?
>>>>
>>> I am referring to this purported Reverend's erratic behavior.
>> Sorry, Bubba, the question here isn't about supposeldoly "eratic"
>> behavior, it's about your suppport for for Republican Party's program
>> of racism.
>>
> How much support did the Civil Rights Act get from Democrats compared
> to Republicans?

Quite a bit, if we are discussing the 1964 Bill which is the main one.
http://tinyurl.com/2x6fcr . You should notice that the only Southern
Democratic Senator to support the bill was a Democrat, and the only
Southern Republican Senator opposed it.


>  The problem as I see it is that the Republicans are much
> less
> socialistic/communistic than the Democrats.

What does this (erroneous) judgment have to do with racism?



>
>

--
*******************
Michael R. McAfee
Mesa, AZ
*******************

Antworten