Re: Rightwing Racist Torture Attack: "woman assaulted, forced to eat feces, stabbed four times in the left leg and beaten"
Von: ClassWarz (nocomplianceskills@noobedienceskills.nosubservienceskills) [Profil]
Datum: 11.09.2007 23:07
Message-ID: <OsDFi.44$ss5.27@newsfe04.lga>
Newsgroup: seattle.politics alt.politics.immigration alt.politics alt.california
Datum: 11.09.2007 23:07
Message-ID: <OsDFi.44$ss5.27@newsfe04.lga>
Newsgroup: seattle.politics alt.politics.immigration alt.politics alt.california
"Paul Mitchum" <usenet@mile23.c0m> wrote in message news:1i4a3q6.lr3h6kd57j7kN%usenet@mile23.c0m... > Rudy Canoza <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote: > >> Paul Mitchum wrote: >> > ClassWarz <NoComplianceSkills@NoObedienceSkills.NoSubservienceSkills> >> > wrote: >> > >> >> "Rudy Canoza" <rudy-canoza@excite.com> wrote in message >> >> news:13edtp7cgbtpqde@corp.supernews.com... >> > [..] >> >>>>> Complete and utter bullshit. Regular bigoted racism among >> >>>>> individuals is just as common on the left as on the right. >> >>>> No, that would make the person not leftist to begin with >> >>> Invalid circular logic, jonssen; also called the "no true Scotsman" >> >>> fallacy. It's a fallacy, jonssen, and you're full of shit. >> >> No, anti-racism is a core leftwing tenet...it's as fundamental to >> >> leftist thinking as the concept of mass is fundamental to physics. >> >> >> >> If you're racist, then you're a rightwinger, by definition...that's >> >> all >> >> there is to it. [..] >> > >> > It's not true that racism defines right-winger, but you're missing the >> > point: Rudy is only saying the shit he's saying in order to prop up his >> > own hatred. >> >> False. >> >> I grudgingly give you a little credit for your first comment, though, >> little paulie. I didn't think you were big enough to say that. > > See? You can't see the truth about me through your own hatred *of* me, > and the only reason you hate me is because you think I'm a liberal, and > you hate liberals. > > It's simply a fact: 'Right-winger' is not defined by racism, since it's > basically a loose definition based on policy positions. It's clear, > however, that many right-wing positions are based on some kind of > bigotry, including an aversion to same-sex marriage, opposition to hate > crimes laws, the desire to commit genocide in the middle east (the > 'blow-em-up-and-let-God-sort-em-out' position), deny women control over > their own bodies, and a general irrational hatred of anyone who isn't > part of their tribe. There are probably other examples I'm overlooking > at the moment, which no doubt someone else will add. > > So it's clear that, as you say, right-wingers aren't automatically > racists, but it's also clear that right-wingers *are,* by and large, > bigots of varying type and degree, based on the policy positions they > seem to uniformly take. If you want to try and make the point that > lefties are similarly racist or bigoted, then you're welcome to try, but > you've been trying for a week now, and no one's buying it. Not even your > right-winger pals. Why equivocate? Just round up to the nearest racist integer...the right is racist, no way around it. ClassWarz > > -- > http://www.xoverboard.com/cartoons/2007/070416_argument.html[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Chester A. Riley (12.09.2007 00:27)
- Paul Mitchum (12.09.2007 01:01)
- ClassWarz (12.09.2007 11:23)
