nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Illiberal liberalism

Von: Rudy Canoza (rudy-canoza@excite.com) [Profil]
Datum: 25.09.2007 07:53
Message-ID: <13fh8i9e7p16569@corp.supernews.com>
Newsgroup: seattle.politics or.politics alt.politicsrec.org.mensa alt.rush-limbaughaz.politics alt.california
Bill Shatzer wrote:
> Robert Miller wrote:
>
>
> -snip-
>
>> How much support did the Civil Rights Act get from Democrats compared
>> to Republicans?
>
> Sez here that 153 democrats and 136 republicans voted for it in the
> house and 46 democrats and 27 republicans voted for it in the senate.

What you see, you fucking Marxist stooge, is that the
bill had greater support among Republicans in
percentage terms than it had among Democrats.
Reproducing Robert's statistics from his earlier post:

The original House version: 290-130   (69%-31%)
The Senate version: 73-27   (73%-27%)
The Senate version, as voted on by the House:
289-126   (70%-30%)

By party
The original House version:
Democratic Party: 153-96   (61%-39%)
Republican Party: 138-34   (80%-20%)

The Senate version:
Democratic Party: 46-22   (68%-32%)
Republican Party: 27-6   (82%-18%)

The Senate version, voted on by the House:
Democratic Party: 153-91   (63%-37%)
Republican Party: 136-35   (80%-20%)

Proportionally, Republicans were stronger proponents of
the bill than Democrats.  Acknowledge that, stupid
Marxist stooge.  Don't try to spin it, stooge -
acknowledge it.

>> The problem as I see it is that the Republicans are much less
>> socialistic/communistic than the Democrats.
>
> Thus displaying a profound misunderstanding of the terms.

He has the proper understanding of the terms, you
stupid lying Marxist stooge.


>> In what nation did the socialist /communists parties care more about
>> social justice than they did for the party members?
>
> In most, I should think.

In *NONE*, you lying fucking Marxist stooge.

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]