Re: VIDEO: MEXICAN ANCHOR BABIES EXPRESS THEIR HATRED OF THE USA (this is the thanks we get after paying for their health care, K-12 education, food stamps, welfare, Sec. 8 housing, etc)
Von: . (rhiannonx@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 20.10.2008 04:55
Message-ID: <4f7e5c06-292a-4683-b291-4fc54e7469e3@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc rec.motorcycles tx.guns alt.californiaaz.politics
Datum: 20.10.2008 04:55
Message-ID: <4f7e5c06-292a-4683-b291-4fc54e7469e3@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: talk.politics.misc rec.motorcycles tx.guns alt.californiaaz.politics
On Oct 19, 2:04 pm, "Vito" <v...@xxcrosslink.net> wrote: > "." <yefelnag...@yahoo.com> wrote > >But the US congress met in closed session and decided that America > >didn't need any racially-mixed citizens. At that time, the typical > >Mexican was 1/3rd White, 1/3rd Indian and 1/3rd Negro. > I simply don't believe it. First, we got Louisiana from France, not Spain > or Mexico, so it is dubious that many Hispanics lived there given that Spain > and France weren't always friendly. The Spanish controlled the port of New Orleans and taxed river traffic in the late 18th and early 19th centuries. Two of my relatives were called traitors for their relationships with the Spanish in Louisiana. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/James_Wilkinson http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Sevier > Second, "Californios", as they called > themselves, were White Spainiards, certainly not indian/bkack Mexicans. Wrong. If you read about "Los Pobladores", the first Spanish colony in Los Angeles, you will read that 44 Mexicans, Mulatos, Indians and Spaniards settled the area about 1781. I have explained many, many, many times how the Spanish colonial system of caste and class worked. The upper class were the White Spaniards, the second class were of any race who were Catholic, they were called "castizos", or "purified ones". The third class was the Mexican mestizo, who was part Indian and part Spanish. The nickname for the mestizo was "coyote". Exactly where the mestizo stood in Spanish colonial society depended upon whether he lived and dressed like a Spaniard, or if he ran around naked like an Indian. If he lived like an Indian, he was considered an "irrational person" and was not free to conduct his own business, own property, or move around the country at will. The forth class was part Spanish and part Negro, and he was called a "mulato", or "mule". > Those I went to school with and later worked with descended from the > original Spanish. and intermarriage was frowned upon. The caste and class system is still at work. Mexicans claim to be "Spanish" and look down on everyone who is darker-skinned than them. The corollary to this is that they also hate anybody who is lighter- skinned than them. > Even then,"Californios" were extremely proud (prejudiced) and parents discouraged > dating Anglos, let alone half-indian Mexicans and certainly not Blacks. The Californios were also proud of being illiterate. It was dangerous to be able to read and write, as they might be denounced to the Spanish Inquisition for being seen reading a book that might be heretical. Meanwhile, down in Mexico, the lighter skinned Mexicans hunted down the darker skinned Negros and Mulatos in the mountains west of Vera Cruz and killed them. That's why there are hardly any Negros in Mexico today...[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
