• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Brooke Shields nude photograph causes controversy at Tate exhibition

The Todal <deadmailbox@beeb.net> wrote in message
news:7igjk4F30thv9U1@mid.individual.net...
>
> "Paul Hyett" <pah@invalid.invalid> wrote in message
> news:LWHLvwNkiwwKFwSN@blueyonder.co.uk...
> > On Tue, 29 Sep 2009 at 23:05:46, Cub Reporter <me@privacy.net> wrote in
> > uk.legal :
> >
> >>Brooke Shields nude photograph causes controversy at Tate exhibition
> >>
> >>A provocative nude photograph of a 10-year-old Brooke Shields is to go
> >>on display at the Tate Modern, to the fury of children's campaigners
> >>who branded it a "magnet" for paedophiles.
> >>
> >>By Anita Singh, Showbusiness Editor
> >>
> >>Telegraph.co.uk, UK: 29 September 2009
> >>http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/celebritynews/6244330/Brooke-
> >>Shields-nude-photograph-causes-controversy-at-Tate-exhibition.html
> >
> > I'd much rather see a recent nude photograph of her!
>
> Is this the offending photo?
> http://www.utata.org/salon/20894.php
>
> If so, it is not in any way indecent or prurient, and if the Daily Mail is
> fearful that it will attract child-molesters to the Tate, maybe the
solution
> is to print the photo in the Mail and save everyone the journey.
>
>


There is a paedophile's wet-dream on film4 again this Thursday.
Gallic rather than phallic, title Water Lillies, long after
the watershed appropriately enough.


ps
What they aren't telling you about DNA profiles
and what Special Branch don't want you to know.
http://www.nutteing.chat.ru/dnapr.htm
or nutteingd in a search engine.

Antworten