• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Is "GAY MARRIAGE" valid because such may have existed in the past?

On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 11:04:13 -0700 (PDT), Emerson Wainwright
<emersonwainwright@gmx.com> wrote:

>> Some gay agenda-ists say "gay marriage" is valid because such was
>> allowed in the past.
>
>They would be presenting a fallacy known as an appeal to tradition,
>just as YOU would be if you said that historically same-sex marriage
>was not allowed and therefore should not be allowed today.

Marriage had a much bigger change when divorce was allowed.   That
change impacted the very basis of marriage and child rearing.

Accepting gay marriages is not nearly as traumatic on existing
marriages and child rearing as accepting divorce was.    The big
difference is that we're used to divorce now.

Antworten