Re: Thumbs Up for Expelled
Von: Thom Madura (tommadura@optonline.net) [Profil]
Datum: 07.10.2008 00:50
Message-ID: <48ea9695$0$4872$607ed4bc@cv.net>
Newsgroup: alt.religion.christian alt.religion.apologetics alt.christnet.theology alt.christnet.philosophy alt.christnet.evangelical alt.christian.religion alt.bible
Datum: 07.10.2008 00:50
Message-ID: <48ea9695$0$4872$607ed4bc@cv.net>
Newsgroup: alt.religion.christian alt.religion.apologetics alt.christnet.theology alt.christnet.philosophy alt.christnet.evangelical alt.christian.religion alt.bible
"monkfish" <monkfish@nowhere> wrote in message news:RpydnbYbVP7e1HTVnZ2dnUVZ_jGdnZ2d@ptd.net... > Thommadura wrote: > > > monkfish wrote: > >> Thommadura wrote: > >> > >>> monkfish wrote: > >>>> Thommadura wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> monkfish wrote: > >>>>>> Thommadura wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Pastor Frank wrote: > >>>>>>>> "Thommadura" <tommadura@optonline.net> wrote in message > >>>>>>>> news:48dc7219$0$4885$607ed4bc@cv.net... > >>>>>>>>> Pastor Frank wrote: > >>>>>>>>>> "bob young" <alaspectrum@netvigator.com> wrote in message > >>>>>>>>>> news:48D87B0C.66748818@netvigator.com... > >>>>>>>>>>> Pastor Frank wrote: > >>>>>>>>>>>> False. Christ proven Himself on the cross of Calvary. Only > >>>>>>>>>>>> you > >>>>>>>>>>>> make > >>>>>>>>>>>> unsupported categorical assertions. > >>>>>>>>>>> Prove there was ever a cross or a Jesus. > >>>>>>>>>>> You cannot of course, what you rely on is handmedowns, > >>>>>>>>>>> padded out by your own religio' ambitions and imaginary 'add > >>>>>>>>>>> ons'. Sad really > >>>>>>>>>>> Bob > >>>>>>>>>>> Humanist, atheist, realist, sentimentalist, Brit. > >>>>>>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>>> We have extensive accounts of Christ, yet you harbour this > >>>>>>>>>> idée > >>>>>>>>>> fixe that Jesus never existed, citing no authoritative opinion, > >>>>>>>>>> nor evidence nor theory, beyond standard atheist doctrine that > >>>>>>>>>> is. > >>>>>>>>>> When will you start evidencing your assertions? > >>>>>>>>> When are you going to realize that you are wrong. > >>>>>>>>> There are NO mentions of the christ by non-religious sources > >>>>>>>>> contemporary to the christ. > >>>>>>>> Why would anyone looking for fame and fortune write about a > >>>>>>>> penniless > >>>>>>>> itinerant preacher with a congregation of 12, but no building, who > >>>>>>>> got himself killed for no good reason? Would anyone today bother to > >>>>>>>> write about such a one, or would he get any mention in the news? > >>>>>>>> I.e. scores of people claim to be healed at Benny Hinn's > >>>>>>>> gatherings, but how many historians write about Benny Hinn, or how > >>>>>>>> many of those claiming healings get into the news? > >>>>>>>> Now prove your point for once!!! "you are wrong" indeed!!!!!!! > >>>>>>>> Quoting your atheist sources proves nothing. > >>>>>>> But you see - there was no penniless itinerant preacher - it is just > >>>>>>> as much a con job as Benny Hinn is. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> THere still remains not a single mention of the christ contemporary > >>>>>>> to his time from a non-religious source - and - interestingly - even > >>>>>>> from other religious sources. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Some of the dead sea scrolls were contemporary to the time of the > >>>>>>> christ -but none mention him. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> We have no fragments of the bible NT that date before about 70AD > >>>>>>> that can be dated. We have NO source material at all for any of the > >>>>>>> bible. We have quotes from the christ from Luke and Paul - who say > >>>>>>> they never saw him - yet - no author of the quotes is mentioned - as > >>>>>>> is the case in most of the bible. We have gospels according to > >>>>>>> "whoever" but no identified author of most of it. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> You are the one claiming that your "fearless leader" existed. > >>>>>>> However - you have made that up just like you made up your own > >>>>>>> religion - based on your own definition of your god - and based on > >>>>>>> the parts of the fabricated bible you choose to include in your > >>>>>>> belief. You yourself have dismissed parts of the bible as fraud. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> It proves one thing - you are just another part of the con. > >>>>>> Don't even worry about the bible for now. > >>>>>> You seem to think you know all about > >>>>>> what it means for non-believers not to believe in God. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Do you have any idea what it means > >>>>>> for believers to believe in God? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> Yes - they bought into the fraud~! > >>>> > >>>> How would you know? > >>>> You don't appear to have ever believed in God. > >>> You know - your memory need checking - maybe Alzheimers or some other > >>> dementia is setting in. YOu really need to see a doctor. > >>> > >>> You SHOULD remember that I was a theists for more than 50 years before I > >>> discovered that they were a fraud. > >>> > >>>> Doesn't it take doubts to detect faith? > >>> > >>> It took a lot of doubt building up over lots of years before I > >>> discovered that religions and gods were false. > >>> > >>> Even then - I became an agnostic - I will believe in every god you can > >>> provide physically testable and verifiable evidence of existence. > >>> However - to date - there are none that qualify. Your especially is a > >>> huge fraud over thousands of years and billions of people - but is > >>> finally waning. > >> > >> > >> Why on earth do you need to believe that > >> God has to be "physically testable and verifiable"? > > > > > > IF an all everything god cannot be physically testable and verifiable - > > then the god is not all everything - period. > > > > > > > >> > >> If you believed so while you were a theist, > >> that means you never understood what it means > >> to believe in God. > > > > That is not true - it was not until I stopped believing in unprovable > > gods that I understood that believing in them was a delusion. > > > > When you stop believing - and you will some day - you will fell the same > > way. > > > Many people are not raised as Christians > but choose to become one much later in life. Many people are raised as theists and choose to stop believing in gods and religions completely - later in life - when their parents are not in control. > > I'm afraid you never had the chance > to properly understand what it means > to believe in God. Actually - You are wrong - I learned very well what it meant to believe in gods - and I stopped doing it.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- monkfish (07.10.2008 01:41)
- Thom Madura (07.10.2008 23:02)
