Re: Voodoo logic
Von: David Z (me@privacy.net) [Profil]
Datum: 04.11.2009 23:42
Message-ID: <7leef3F3ck7pgU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: alt.circumcisionmisc.health.aids
Datum: 04.11.2009 23:42
Message-ID: <7leef3F3ck7pgU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: alt.circumcisionmisc.health.aids
"john" <nospam@bt.com> wrote in message news:woudnRyaqoFwaWzXnZ2dnUVZ7oKdnZ2d@bt.com... > > "Jake Waskett" <jake@waskett.org> wrote in message news:tnmIm.75848 >> >> I get the feeling that John's just nuts. I don't think he's doing it on >> purpose. I may be wrong, but that's my intuition. > > Yeah, don't forget your 'intuition' was behind your circumcision ;0) > > Lucky it didn't take off your nuts too :0) > > and 'nuts' is basic ad hominem, ie no argument, or basic denial mechanism "Nuts" is an adjective. In your case, an entirely appropriate one.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
