• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Christians against Starbucks

Danny Joe <dpiette@gmail.com> wrote:
> Mother Jones explains it all:
>
> http://www.motherjones.com/mojoblog/archives/2008/05/8196_new_starbucks_m.html

Y'know, they could _almost_ get away with their righteous indignation, if
they claimed that portrayal of a mythical (pagan?) beast on the cups was
an affront to their religion. But complaining about the sexuality of said
mythical beast? Sounds like a beastiality complex to me.

What does this group think of the WWF logo, with a COMPLETELY NAKED PANDA
ON ALL FOURS, LIKE SOME GAY PROSTITUTE!!!!!

Whew! Sorry, got carried away for a second there.

Colin

Antworten