Re: Dan's Mail Format Site | Tools | Message Checker
Von: FirstName LastName (first_last@erehwon.com) [Profil]
Datum: 18.12.2006 14:02
Message-ID: <em66bn$6p7$1@aioe.org>
Newsgroup: alt.comp.freeware
Datum: 18.12.2006 14:02
Message-ID: <em66bn$6p7$1@aioe.org>
Newsgroup: alt.comp.freeware
Paul Lutus wrote: > FirstName LastName wrote: > / ... >>> Utterly false. Please keep posting Mr. "FirstName LastName". Each post >>> you make increases the validity of my position on the irresponsible >>> behavior of the typical anoynymous poster. >> I've ... > "I've"? There is no "I've" here! you are not a person, you are a nickname! > Want to be treated with the respect and deference due a person? Post using > a name! >> give you credit for being knowledgeable person and worth listening >> to but now I've lost all of my goodwill. > Nicknames don't have goodwill or any other recognizable human traits. > If you were an actual person, you would be identified as a hypocrite, > someone who wants to be accorded certain rights, but someone unwilling to > accept the responsibilities that are tied to those rights. People have > names, people have rights, you have neither. > This is all hypothetical, because you are not a person. Prove me wrong. Go > to a bank. Take out a loan under your nickname, "FirstName LastName." > Provide no other identification. See if the bank treats you with more > respect that I have. > Proving what, you may ask? Proving that the problem lies with you, not me or > the bank. >> The only "irresponsible behavior" comes from you. Your track record of >> lying and insulting is clear evidence. > I can only insult a person. You are not a person. Q.E.D. > Any why do I not care that you assert that I have been "lying"? The > statement is false and actionable, but you are not a person, so who cares? > Courts look askance at attempts to bring legal actions against evanescent > wisps of logorrhea. > If you were a named person, you might well say the same thing, but you would > think twice about it, rather than not at all. This demonstrates my thesis > that named people act more responsibly, as though any more evidence were > needed. > I am getting tired of this infantile logic and behavior (not just from you). > Your posting history says, loud and clear, "I can hide behind a shield that > assures -- nay, guarantees -- complete personal irresponsibility, while at > the same time demanding the rights accorded to people who accept adult > responsibilities." > Yes, you can do that, indeed you are doing it, and you can and will suffer > the consequences. The primary consequence is that you are treated with > precisely the deference and respect that your choices and actions merit. > Addendum. This is a two-way street. If you posted under a name, I would have > to act differently toward you, as well as the reverse. As things stand, > because it is impossible to libel a nickname, I can say anything I please. > But you haven't thought about that, or much of anyting else, Mr. "FirstName > LastName". More idiotic ranting. You are beyond all reasoning. Goodbye, "Mr. Lutus".[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Peter Seiler (18.12.2006 16:13)
- Craig (18.12.2006 21:04)
- FirstName LastName (19.12.2006 13:32)
- FirstName LastName (19.12.2006 13:28)
- Peter Seiler (20.12.2006 15:05)
