Re: Freeware windows digital photo editors (did we miss any)?
Von: Franklin (franklinsays@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 03.07.2007 20:59
Message-ID: <1183489195.617369.215830@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: microsoft.public.windowsxp.photos comp.graphics.apps.corel rec.photo.digital alt.comp.freeware
Datum: 03.07.2007 20:59
Message-ID: <1183489195.617369.215830@c77g2000hse.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: microsoft.public.windowsxp.photos comp.graphics.apps.corel rec.photo.digital alt.comp.freeware
Robert Coe wrote: > But what is the purpose of the list? Because they are control freaks. >If it's to assist the reader > in selecting among the many available "free" programs, shouldn't it include > those that were "free" to him, even though they may not have been available to > everyone? Exactly. > OTOH, if constructing the list is seen merely as an intellectual exercise > unrelated to its value to others, then those who compile it should feel free > to impose whatever criteria they please for what gets included and what > doesn't. But then, why bother? Exactly.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Franklin (04.07.2007 10:36)