Re: alt.comp.freeware information

On 22 Jul 2007, Bear Bottoms <bearbottoms1@gmai.com> wrote:

> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 10:16:32 -0500, Susan Bugher
> <sebugher@yahoo.com>  wrote:
>
>> Bear Bottoms wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 22 Jul 2007 09:57:15 -0500, Susan Bugher
>>> <sebugher@yahoo.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>> Pricelessware is "The best of the best in Freeware - selected by
>>>> alt.comp.freeware participants"
>>>  Be truthful, as selected by pricelessware participants doing
>>>  website
>>> business in ACF.
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll
>> "The troll takes (what it knows to be) a badly flawed, wholly
>> illogical  argument. . ."
>>
>> about the Pricelessware List
>> http://www.pricelesswarehome.org/2007/about2007PL.php
>>
>> Message-ID: <op.tqhiw4p2jo4m88@c57jw11>
>>
http://groups.google.com/group/alt.comp.freeware/msg/fdeb6e9aa55c20
>> 36 From: "Bear Bottoms"
>> "Pricelessware and participants: I apologize for wrongly using
>> such  tactics as Pricelessware is a generous endeavor that tries
>> to share  freeware with anyone who would like it.  I'm sorry."
>>
>> Susan
>
> Susan Bugher refused to accept such an apology made directly to her
> in  good faith by me in an attempt to end the flame wars even
> though she  started and continues to promulgate them. She uses what
> she thinks is  shrewd tactics in attempts to preserve what she
> perceives as her dominance  in this newsgroup. The latest example
> of this can be witnessed via her  reply to a post I made about
> Orbit Downloader in which she raised question  about malware. The
> program does not contain malware which is easily  discerned. She
> claims to be ACF point person.
>
> Pricelessware website participants are firmly implanted in this
> newsgroup  and are using it for their own purpose of promoting a
> website. As with  most of these type agendas, they will demonstrate
> whatever behavior is  necessary to maintain that foothold and
> continue to try and dominate the  group utilizing various tactics.
> This has well be witnessed and  documented. My apology was an
> attempt to end the flame wars started by Susan over these matters.
> It was rejected.
>


You write that your apology to Susan was rejected.
That sounds rather significant.

Do you have a message-ID for that rejection?


--

The cult maintains there is no cult and it should know.
Susan is our high priestess. http://i14.tinypic.com/4kwqm94.jpg
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]