Re: XXCOPY question
Von: B. R. 'BeAr' Ederson (br.ederson@expires-2007-08-31.arcornews.de) [Profil]
Datum: 26.08.2007 17:03
Message-ID: <szxo49ceaw4v$.dlg@br.ederson.news.arcor.de>
Newsgroup: alt.comp.freeware
Datum: 26.08.2007 17:03
Message-ID: <szxo49ceaw4v$.dlg@br.ederson.news.arcor.de>
Newsgroup: alt.comp.freeware
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 10:07:11 -0400, J. Y. wrote: > I just tried using the /y along with the /q3 switches and it works! > > Thanks again for your help. You're welcome. :-) > It's too bad that my feeling for xxcopy has cooled off considerably. > > Especially since it has another problem (the /er switch doesn't work) XXCopy is known to exit differently than XCopy even when the /ER switch is applied. But that usually applies to command lines which differ from the possibilities XCopy provides. Most importantly, *every* exit code of 0 should indicate "No error", while any exit code different from 0 indicates a problem of some kind. (Which, of course, is the most important differentiation.) > and also because I have already converted the job to XCOPY, which > appears to work. IMHO, it is a good idea to rely first upon system tools. It trains for situations on PC's of other people which are neither online nor well equipped with third party tools. ;-) BeAr -- ========================================================================== = What do you mean with: "Perfection is always an illusion"? ===============================================================--(Oops!)==[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
