nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

WARNING: These people now have their hands all over your jobs and paypackets.

Von: 0Z0NB (0z0nb@do00od00.com) [Profil]
Datum: 06.07.2008 06:40
Message-ID: <48704c99$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au>
Newsgroup: alt.conspiracy alt.politics.bush alt.energy.renewablesci.geo.meteorology sci.skeptic aus.politics sci.environment alt.global-warmingaus.invest
Switching off Victoria

July 06, 2008



It's utterly unbelievable that the Rudd Government should be
contemplating making bankrupt the stations that provide more than 90 per
cent of Victoria's power:



Although careful to respect the Federal Government's process, Victorian
Energy Minister Peter Batchelor appears increasingly nervous in his
public comments. Asked if one of the state's brown coal generators will
be forced to close prematurely, he said: "It depends on the nature of
the emissions trading scheme (introduced)."



If it's one like Garnaut actually recommends - with no compensation to
power stations for wiping billions off their value - the generators are
cactus. And here is Kevin Rudd's modus operandi writ large and
destructive: process over purpose. What possible good could there be to
cause such an economic catastrophe in this state?



But Rudd's guru has a solution of the kind the Soviet Union would have
suggested:



In his report, Professor Garnaut said $1 billion to $2 billion of the
emissions trading scheme proceeds should be invested in clean coal
technologies, matched dollar for dollar by the companies. If clean coal
worked, he said, the Latrobe Valley would heave a "prosperous and
expansive future". If it didn't, money from the scheme should be used to
help retrain workers and to help the valley community survive the brave
new world of zero emissions.



Hey, let the Government spend a couple of billion of taxpayers' money,
and another couple of billion of the bosses', on a yet-to-be proved
"solution" many experts say is pie in the sky. And then, $4 billion
later, let's give the unemployed some handouts.








http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/switching_off_v
ictoria/
--


Warmest Regards

Bonzo

"From 1870 to 1900, we had global cooling, then we had significant
global warming from about 1910 to 1945. That global warming is not
accompanied by any significant rise in CO2, so you can't blame CO2. Then
CO2 increased while we had global cooling. You can't blame that on CO2.
It's only been the last 30 years there's been correlation between CO2
and global warming" Dr. Don J. Easterbrook, Professor Emeritus Geology,
Western Washington University




[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten