What's The Matter Krudd, Nobody Falling For Your Greenhoax Scam?


This man is starking raving mad and should be locked up for his own and
everyone else's safety!

November 7 2009





KRudd  goes feral, rebutting global warming sceptics and his critics not
with facts but the most extraordinary abuse and wild claims:



"Mr KRudd  capped a week dominated by debate on the government's handling of
asylum seekers aboard the Oceanic Viking with a vicious political attack
over an issue on which he had recently said little. "



"It had been about seven months since the prime minister - elected on a
platform of action on climate change - last delivered a major speech on the
topic...."



"The do-nothing climate change sceptics are still alive and well in the
coalition," Mr KRudd  said....



"The argument that we must not act until others do is an argument that has
been used by political cowards since time immemorial both of the left and
the right. They are reckless gamblers who are betting all our futures on
their arrogant assumption that their intuitions should triumph over the
evidence. "



"You are betting our jobs, our houses, our farms, our reefs, our economy and
our future on an intuition on a gut feeling; on a political prejudice you
have about science."



I'm crushed. Nationals Senate leader Barnaby Joyce is apparently "the
fear-monger in chief".



And still KRudd  rants on:



"He said all were ''quite literally holding the world to ransom'' "



Oh, holding people to ransom?



Like this, Prime Minister?



"At this stage we're only making one guarantee and that's that we'll stop
fasting if our demands are met. And our demands are for world leaders to
commit to stabilising greenhouse gases in the atmosphere at 350 parts per
million and to commit to providing at least $160 billion per year to the
developing world "



Or this?



"NEXT month KRudd  flies to Copenhagen to help seal a UN deal to cut the
world's emissions. So here's the question: is KRudd  really going to approve
a draft treaty that could force Australia to hand over an astonishing $7
billion a year to a new and unelected global authority? "



But let's review the lowlights of his amazing rant.



First, of course, panicky KRudd  sees a conspiracy:



"The tentacles of the climate change skeptics reach deep into the ranks of
the Liberal Party and, once you add the National Party, its plan, the
skeptics and the deniers are a major force. The legion of climate change
skeptics are active across the world..."



Hey, we're a "major force" now?



I thought we were tiny in number and isolated?



"The clock is ticking for the planet, but the climate change skeptics simply
do not care. The vested interests at work are simply too great."



You mean someone's paying me to be a sceptic?



And every doubting scientist is just corrupt, selling out the planet for
dollars?



This man's insane.



But on he goes, making a fool of himself:



"And the most recent IPCC scientific conclusion in 2007 was that "warming of
the climate system is unequivocal" and the "increase in global average
temperatures since the mid 20th century is very likely due to the observed
increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations." This is the
conclusion of 4,000 scientists appointed by governments from virtually every
country in the world, and the term "very likely" is defined in the
scientific conclusion of this report as being 90 per cent probable."



But, but, but ...

so even the believers have 10 per cent doubt?



Are sceptical?



Oh, and Prime Minister, your 4000 figure is a gross exaggeration.



In fact, as John McLean discovered, there are just 2900 IPCC scientists, of
whom only 60 have specifically endorsed the claim that humans are heating
the planet to dangerous levels. Other IPCC scientists say there's no proof
of this at all.



KRudd  boasts:



"the Government had built wide support for action on climate through a
carbon pollution reduction scheme."



Really?



But what KRudd  doesn't say is how he built this "support" - by bribing
business with offers of free permits and compensation, and by having the
CSIRO censor a report that said his scheme was a crock. And if the support
is so "wide", why this panic?



KRudd  tells us to dismiss warnings that his emissions tax swindle (ETS)
will cost billions of dollars and thousands of jobs. We must just trust:



Treasury modelling



Treasury modelling, eh?



The modelling of a Treasury that did not predict the financial crisis, and
then did not predict the sudden recovery. The Treasury modelling that
presumes we'll be saved by green technology that does not exist, and that
within months is found to be so dodgy that it this week led to this:



"Treasury costings ... found that instead of between $11 billion and $20bn
in excess revenue that was anticipated by the Coalition to pay for its
proposed changes, the ETS will deliver just $2.5bn over 10 years."



KRudd  scoffs:



"Enter the "world government" conspiracy theorists."



But, Prime Minister, look at the very treaty whose draft you've been
negotiating - and tell me again that it wasn't drawn up by fruitloops
dreaming of having some power over the world ... and its billions.



Check this clause, for instance:



"Financial resources of the Convention Adaptation Fund"] [may] [shall]
include: (a) [Assessed contributions [of at least 0.7% of the annual GDP of
developed country parties]"



And this, about a new UN board's proposed power to:



"impose financial penalties, at a minimum of 10 times the market price of
carbon, for any emissions in excess"



And to impose "penalties and fines on non-compliance of developed country
parties" such as Australia for not honoring:



"commitment's to ... provide support in the form of financial resources,
technology transfer and capacity building. "



And never let it me said that this Christian Prime Minister is too prissy to
use the foulest of smears, using even the Holocaust dead to befoul
scientists and commentators who simply disagree with him on the evidence or
on the worth of the colossal green taxes he now proposes:



"Like the arguments from climate change deniers..."



And KRudd  claims that I, the father of three, am so vicious that I would
rather spite him than save my children:



"And by doing so, these do-nothing climate change skeptics are prepared to
destroy our children's future."



In fact, people like me - who point out that KRudd 's scheme will not work,
even if there were proof that the world is heating dangerously and man is to
blame - are a menace to children everywhere:



"This brigade of do-nothing climate change skeptics are dangerous because if
they succeed, then it is all of us who will suffer. Our children. And our
grandchildren."



Oh, sorry.



You think I've got tickets on myself in assuming that KRudd  is singling out
me as a corrupt, cynical, unscientific, Holocaust-denying, conspiratorial
menace even to my own children?



Actually, KRudd  four times in his speech names me as a member of this inner
circle of evil.



For instance:



"Malcolm, Barnaby, Andrew, Janet - stop gambling with our future."



I can't tell you just how nasty, dishonest, ill-informed and hysterical
KRudd 's speech is.



But Roger Pielke Jr, a leading professor of environmental science can.



Pielke is alarmed by KRudd 's hysterical tone:



"In Australia, Prime Minister KRudd  has given the most chilling speech with
respect to open policy debate that I have ever heard from a leader of a
democratic country. The focus of his speech is on "climate change deniers."
Who are these people? They include people who are skeptical of climate
change science, but remarkably, they also include people who believe that
climate change is real and a problem, but disagree with the Prime Minister's
preferred policy approach.... "



"Can witch trials and pogroms be far behind? What bothers me about the
speech is not so much the criticism of people who reject mainstream science.
Fine, criticism of them as rolling the dice on a minority view is fair and
appropriate. What bothers me is the explicit equation of people who question
a policy's effectiveness or desirability with the idea of being a "denier"
and thus being "dangerous." KRudd  is openly conflating views on science
with views on politics."



Incidentally, with KRudd  so damning of sceptics, who in his Government or
the CSIRO would dare doubt?



http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andrewbolt/index.php/heraldsun/comments/or_up_to_your_d
ecayed_ankles_in_100_years/





Warmest Regards



Bon z0



"It is a remarkable fact that despite the worldwide expenditure of perhaps
US$50 billion since 1990, and the efforts of tens of thousands of scientists
worldwide, no human climate signal has yet been detected that is distinct
from natural variation."

Bob Carter, Research Professor of Geology, James Cook University, Townsville
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten

alldownunder (07.11.2009 03:29)