nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Staff Dept Justice: US 'Trials' by Patricia Cornwell to Ban Blogger, Websites Were Fraudulent

Von: Dan Hajidah (dh-news@europe.com) [Profil]
Datum: 27.02.2009 22:03
Message-ID: <Xns9BBFE04382262dhnewseuropecom@69.16.185.252>
Followup-to: alt.current-events
Newsgroup: alt.politics.libertarian alt.current-events.usa alt.current-events alt.current-affairs
US Justice: US 'Trials' of Pol. Refugee in Europe Fraudulent

by Dan Hajidah


- US Dept of Justice sources: US 'Trials' of Political Refugee in Europe
Were Both Fraudulent
- US federal courts used illegally, to ban and slander dissident
journalist and blogger Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs
- US federal judges send harassing e-mails to Europe over refugee from
US court corruption;  US judges get European message, shove your e-mails
"up the rectum"!

Originally published at Indymedia:

http://www.indymedia.nl/nl/2009/02/57826.shtml - or also at:
http://mytinyurl.net/bee8e8

Original Indymedia version includes public domain photo of political
refugee from US Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs at the EU Parliament


The new United States Attorney General under President Obama, Eric H.
Holder Jr, is currently pondering the European request, that he bring
criminal charges against the US group who have mounted several years of
attacks against the US dissident writer Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, now
living as an exile refugee from the US in Europe.

Dr Les Sachs, a US anti-corruption author and journalist, and himself a
former award-winning US Department of Justice ('DOJ') employee, was
forced to become a political refugee in Europe, after what DOJ sources
describe as a scheme of extortion and threats of murder, that were
funded by the Bush family friend, political financier, and famous author
Patricia Cornwell, and involving some prominent US law firms in specific
criminal acts against Sachs.

As described by the DOJ sources, these crimes of extortion and threats
of murder - and other elements such as the illegal blocking of Sachs'
political websites and blogs from the internet - took place as part of
two US federal 'court proceedings' that were conducted in the state of
Virginia, USA, where Dr Les Sachs lived before he was forced to escape
to Europe.

The second of these two bizarre 'trials' was actually held in absentia,
after Dr Les Sachs was already living in Belgium in a secret location,
as a political refugee from the US government and judges - so in this
second 'proceeding', the US judges merely e-mailed Sachs their new
'court orders' against him, having no address to serve him with any
papers.

Sources within the US Dept of Justice itself - who were blocked from
prosecuting the multiple crimes against Dr Les Sachs while Bush was
President - detail how both of these US federal 'trials' against the
dissident journalist Sachs were illegal and fraudulent, and in fact were
not 'trials' at all.

According to DOJ staff, it is clear that not only were both of the
trials against the refugee Sachs fraudulent and illegal, in fact all the
US 'court orders' against Sachs are actually null and void.

These so-called 'trials' generated a series of US federal 'court
orders' which imposed multiple bans on Dr Sachs' freedom to write and
speak, the blocking of Sachs' European websites so that his sites cannot
be found via Google and other search engines.

These US 'court orders' include various other bizarre elements, such as
Sachs being supposedly 'required' to pay hundreds of thousands of
dollars to two friends of US federal Judge Robert Payne, who supervised
the first 'trial' against Sachs, and with Judge Payne and his friends
all involved in a 'Freedom Foundation' which turns out not to exist.

According to the DOJ sources, the political financier Patricia Cornwell,
paid these friends of federal judge Payne to threaten to torture Sachs
to death in a US jail cell, and these friends of the judge used the
threats of torture and murder to extort money out of Sachs, until Sachs
was forced to escape to Europe to save his life.


This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence:
<a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><img
alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0"
src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/></a><br/>T
his
work is licenced under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons
Licence</a>.


Significantly, no United States lawyer has ever yet been brave enough,
to walk into a US courtroom and file a simple form to have these illegal
'orders' against Dr Les Sachs to be officially nullified, because US
lawyers are afraid of speaking about the evidence that US federal judges
themselves are participating in criminal acts to have the dissident
Sachs murdered. - US lawyers privately express fear of mafia-style
revenge by US judges and their cronies.

The fear and cowardice of US lawyers, have frustrated those inside the
US Department of Justice, who have long wanted to prosecute the crimes
against Sachs, despite the political pressures resulting from Patricia
Cornwell's million-dollar gifts to the George Bush family.

These sources at the US Department of Justice detail in specifics how
both of the US 'trials' against Dr Les Sachs were fraudulent, and show
some of the proof documents which make clear that both of these trials
were fraudulent and illegal.

Some of these specific proof documents from US Department of Justice
files, and US court and European police files, are already scanned and
online at the website, 'Patricia Cornwell Court Trial Documents', which
can be found here:

http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

Just below are the details of internal US Department of Justice notes,
as to why both of the United States federal court 'trials' against the
dissident writer Dr Les Sachs are illegal and fraudulent, and why all
the US 'court orders' against Sachs are actually null and void.


For general background on the history of the US government attacks on
the dissident Sachs, and about the Patricia Cornwell - Dr Les (Leslie)
Sachs legal cases, see the following, which provide accurate facts, in
contrast to various false US media pieces, false Wikipedia articles, and
even articles by dishonest US law professors, which have been publishing
lies and hoaxes in order to hide the crimes of the US judges. Accurate
journalism about these cases can be found here:


Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs

http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at:
http://mytinyurl.net/10e98


US Blocking Belgian Journalism Websites to Help Murder US Dissident in
Brussels

http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259 - also at:
http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e


The attacks on the Jewish-heritage Dr Les Sachs, involve racist and
anti-Semitic elements tied to Sachs' personal Jewish heritage. Sachs is
non-Zionist, so 'Jewish leaders' leave Sachs abandoned, and remain in
silence about the threats to have Sachs murdered.

Most centrally, the attacks on Sachs involve direct US government
repression to silence Sachs' journalism, to shut down his blogs and
block his writings from internet search results, and also the spread of
media lies and hoaxes to destroy Sachs' reputation.

The US federal judges themselves have written long dishonest essays
telling lies about Sachs and making personal insulting attacks on him,
while ordering Google and other search engines to block Sachs' own
European websites, in order to hide Sachs' responses to the lies by US
judges.

Unable to have personal control over the refugee Sachs in his new home
in Europe, the US judges exercise their hatred for Sachs by conducting a
propaganda war against him, and trying to control the internet so that
Sachs cannot make any statements to defend himself or to help protect
his own life.

The blocking of Dr Les Sachs' European websites from worldwide internet
search engines, helping to further the US threats to have Sachs
murdered, is viewed by lawyers as a serious US violation of
international laws and treaties. Sachs' main European website, though
blocked, still exists at www (point) dr-les-sachs (point) be - Note: Do
not put this site as a direct web page link, as any web page listing it
may be blocked from internet search results.


US Dept of Justice sources: Why both 'trials' against the refugee
dissident Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs are fraudulent, why all the US 'court
orders' against Sachs are illegal, null and void

Following are the contents of internal US Department of Justice notes,
as to why both of the US 'legal proceedings' against Sachs, and all
their 'court orders' are completely invalid. These notes make reference
to proof documents that are also held within the US Department of
Justice, as well as European police files - And some of these documents
are already scanned and online at the site, 'Patricia Cornwell Court
Trial Documents', which can be found here:

http://cornwell-trial-documents.skyrock.com/

As these notes of the US Department of Justice are presented, readers
who wish to view the original documents and further analysis can consult
the above-linked site.

No less than twelve separate reasons are listed, as to why both of the
US 'legal proceedings' of Patricia Cornwell and the US judges and
government, against the journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, are fraudulent
and invalid. Here is just the list, with full details for each of these,
and links to proof documents, given below.

(1) Right near the beginning of her attacks on him, Patricia Cornwell
committed clear felony perjury against Sachs on a main central issue,
this makes all her proceedings against Sachs null and void.

(2) In the initial 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against
Sachs, Cornwell's lawyers arranged for an instant, completely illegal
banning of Dr Les Sachs' freedom to write and speak, by prior collusion
between US federal Judge Robert Payne and the Willcox & Savage law firm.
This is illegal corruption and court fraud by Judge Robert Payne, and by
Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, so the whole proceeding is
fraudulent, null and void.

(3) Lawyers Thomas H Roberts and Tim Schulte, posing as lawyers for
Sachs, were actually working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage,
and threatened to have Sachs tortured and murdered. Thus the entire
'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against Sachs is illegal and
fraudulent, and the court orders from it null and void.

(4) Thomas Roberts and Tim Schulte, while working for Patricia Cornwell
and posing as lawyers for Dr Les Sachs, also claimed to be part of a
'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist, and Judge Robert Payne also
spoke as salesman for this 'Freedom Foundation' of his corrupt criminal
friend Roberts.

(5) The Patricia Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts - working
for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage - himself committed multiple
felonies of perjury while testifying as to the facts of the Patricia
Cornwell case.

(6) There was no actual 'trial' in the first Patricia Cornwell legal
case against Sachs which ended a few weeks after it started, with the
announcement of a so-called 'settlement', which is clearly a complete
fraud. The claim is that, after merely a few weeks of being 'sued by
Patricia Cornwell', that somehow, magically and for the great benefit of
Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers:
- that Dr Les Sachs 'suddenly' agreed to the permanent banning of his
own freedom of speech and freedom of press for the rest of his life;
- that Sachs agreed to have his publishing company and writing career
completely destroyed;
- that Sachs agreed to have his own personal reputation destroyed, and
not to respond to lies that were published about him;
- that Sachs agreed to a lifelong personal enslavement to Judge Robert
Payne, where Sachs could be personally jailed at any time under Judge
Payne's whim;
- and that Sachs agreed to spend the rest of his life paying several
hundred thousand dollars plus 18 per cent interest, to Judge Payne's
personal friend Thomas Roberts, and his partner Tim Schulte, two lawyers
with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' who were working for Patricia
Cornwell.
This so-called 'settlement' is a clear fraud, utterly impossible, as the
successful anti-corruption author Sachs had no assets to lose by a full
trial and appeal of illegal 'orders'.

(7) In 2007, the same group of US federal judges in Virginia, the '4th
Circuit', who held the first fraudulent proceeding as detailed above,
held a second in absentia 'legal proceeding' against Sachs in Belgium,
ordering the blocking of Sachs' sites from the internet search engines.
This new legal proceeding was premised on 'enforcing' the orders of the
first legal proceeding, which has been proven fraudulent as above, thus
any proceeding based on that is also fraudulent and illegal, all of its
'court orders' also null and void.
DOJ sources also describe the 2007 'trial' as involving new felony
perjury by Patricia Cornwell with fake 'stalking' stories against Sachs;
felony perjury by an 'expert witness' who made false statements that Dr
Les Sachs is a 'cyberstalker'; and lies in court papers by Cornwell's
lawyers Lukey and Morris, committing 'obstruction of justice' about
Cornwell's earlier crimes. Thus the 2007 'trial' is fraudulent and its
orders null and void as well, according to the DOJ sources.

(8) It is clear that it is fraudulent for the US judges to hold a 'legal
proceeding' against a victim whom they threaten to illegally jail and
murder if he returns to the country to argue his case, and where they
are also threatening to disbar or otherwise personally harm any US
lawyer who would dare to represent this victim who took refuge in
Europe.

(9) For the 2007 'legal proceeding', Sachs was never even served with
legal papers. The US judges and lawyers merely resorted to sending Dr
Les Sachs their new fraudulent 'court orders' by e-mail.

(10) The 2007 in absentia trial against Sachs, to block his websites and
to enable the completion of his murder, was held by the same 4th Circuit
US federal judges who are named in a standing Appeal by Sachs as legal
parties to the ongoing case.

(11) Dr Les Sachs had already published extensive journalism about
corruption by both US 4th Circuit district and Appeals judges, and how
these judges are involved in threatening to murder him. These judges
must not hold any proceedings about matters in which they are personally
involved as objects of the journalism of Dr Les Sachs. They were
obligated to have any new case involving Sachs transferred to another
Circuit altogether.

(12) The US 2007 'legal proceeding' against Dr Les Sachs, ordering the
blocking of his European websites from readers around the world, so that
Sachs can be slandered and killed, and the world deprived of reading his
political journalism, is a criminal act in direct violation of
international treaties both on the subject of terrorism and on open
control of the internet.


Now for the full details of the above:


DOJ Notes - Why the 4th Circuit 'Trials' of Sachs with Patricia Cornwell
are Illegal Frauds, All 'Court Orders' upon Sachs Null and Void


(1) Right near the beginning of her attacks on him, Patricia Cornwell
committed clear felony perjury against Sachs on a main central issue,
this makes all her proceedings against Sachs null and void.

Scan of the court transcript page proving the actual act of Patricia
Cornwell engaged in felony perjury against Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs:

http://mytinyurl.net/1


And scans of the extortion letter and court papers about which Patricia
Cornwell is lying, that prove she is committing perjury:

http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e

http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b


(2) In the initial 'legal proceeding' of Patricia Cornwell against
Sachs, Cornwell's lawyers arranged for an instant and illegal banning of
Dr Les Sachs' freedom to write and speak, by prior collusion between US
federal Judge Robert Payne and the Willcox & Savage law firm. Apparently
there was a successful bribery offer to Payne by Conrad Shumadine of
Willcox & Savage. Shumadine was already a friend of 'Judge Robert Payne
is my name, Federal bribery is my game.'

Judge Robert Payne was appointed to office by Patricia Cornwell's
personal friend of many years, the first US President George Bush, to
whose family Cornwell has given millions of dollars.

This illegal ban on Dr Les Sachs' freedom of speech and freedom of the
press, was imposed by phone call of Judge Payne, a few minutes after
Sachs got the legal papers, which Sachs didn't even have time to finish
reading. It was farce theatre as well as illegal, carefully timed and
arranged by collusion between Judge Robert Payne and Willcox & Savage
and the process-servers, who delayed serving the legal papers on Sachs
till just before Judge Payne's phone call.

Willcox & Savage had also arranged in advance to publish nationwide
media articles attacking and smearing Sachs, and meanwhile Judge Payne
had instantly ordered that Sachs faced jail if he dared to respond to
the false media. - So lawyers and the public were discouraged from
helping Sachs or supporting him, given the lies in the media and on the
internet. Sachs was even banned from saying that his freedom of speech
had been banned.

Patricia Cornwell's lawyer Shumadine was such a bold liar, that he even
used some of the false media articles that he himself had planted, as
'evidence' to support the banning of Sachs' freedom of speech and
freedom of the press.

This is illegal, clear corruption and court fraud by Judge Robert Payne,
and by Cornwell's lawyers at Willcox & Savage, so the whole proceeding
with Payne is fraudulent, null and void.

For more information on Conrad Shumadine and Willcox & Savage, their
relationship with Judge Robert Payne, and their role with Patricia
Cornwell in the attacks on Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/708092


(3) With Dr Les Sachs instantly under threat of jail if he said anything
about any crimes against him, Judge Robert Payne and Patricia Cornwell's
lawyers at Willcox & Savage, then quickly moved to the next phase of
court fraud and extortion.

Judge Payne quickly assigned one of his own personal friends to
'represent' Sachs, a Virginia lawyer named Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts, aided
by another lawyer, originally from Germany, and with neo-Nazi and anti-
Semitic views, Tim Schulte (occasionally 'Timothy Schulte').

Multiple proofs of fraud and extortion show that Tom Roberts and Tim
Schulte were really working for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage.

When Sachs realised that Roberts and Schulte were working directly for
Cornwell, Roberts and Schulte threatened to have Sachs jailed and
tortured to death in jail under Judge Payne's power, if Sachs dared to
denounce them or try to 'fire' them.

The threats to have the Jewish Sachs tortured and murdered were
apparently a matter of great sadistic pleasure for Patricia Cornwell,
and this pleasure was great enough that Cornwell was willing to pay
Willcox & Savage several hundred thousand dollars, for the pleasure of
extorting a Jew, taking his human rights away, and threatening to
torture him to death.

Since the lawyers Roberts and Schulte were actually working for Patricia
Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, and as Roberts and Schulte threatened to
have Sachs tortured and murdered, the entire 'legal proceeding' of
Patricia Cornwell against Sachs is illegal, fraudulent, and the court
orders from it null and void.

For Patricia Cornwell's public boasting that she can successfully murder
people when she wishes - from Vanity Fair magazine - see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/7ee992


For court transcript of Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts under oath, talking about
murdering Dr Les Sachs, and Roberts' other crimes in the Patricia
Cornwell case being exposed, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(4) Thomas H Roberts and Tim Schulte, while working for Patricia
Cornwell and posing as lawyers for Dr Les Sachs, also claimed to be part
of a 'Freedom Foundation' which does not exist, and Judge Robert Payne
also spoke as salesman for this 'Freedom Foundation' of his criminal
friend Roberts.

Roberts had spent ten dollars for a corporate name registration for his
fake 'foundation', but did no filings with the Internal Revenue Service
or state foundation authorities, as required by US law. Yet Roberts has
used his fake foundation to obtain money and defraud people, in felony
violation of federal statutes. - For their fake 'foundation', Roberts
and Schulte have used the name similar to an actual registered
Foundation, the 'FreedomWorks Foundation' of billionaire Steve Forbes,
though the fake 'Freedom Works Foundation' of Roberts and Schulte and
Judge Payne has no connection.

Roberts and Schulte also used the name of law school Dean Rodney 'Rod'
Smolla, their former teacher, as also involved in this fraudulent
foundation. Smolla is now Dean of Judge Payne's own law school - the
circles of Virginia corruption are nicely small.

Under the doctrine of 'fraud upon the court', with Judge Payne and Tom
Roberts and Tim Schulte, all claiming that Roberts and Schulte are in a
'Freedom Foundation' that does not exist, and claiming that this
'Foundation' was 'helping' Dr Les Sachs - It is clear that the entire
legal proceeding and all 'court orders' from this proceeding are
fraudulent, null and void.

Roberts and Judge Payne were so bold in their fraud with their fake
'Freedom Foundation' that they have put this fraud on the internet, in
multiple documents, and in court transcript. Here is a court transcript
where Thomas Roberts is cornered into essentially acknowledging that his
fake 'foundation' is indeed an illegal fraud:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(5) The Patricia Cornwell case lawyer Thomas H 'Tom' Roberts - working
for Patricia Cornwell and Willcox & Savage, though falsely claiming to
'represent' Cornwell's victim Dr Les Sachs - himself committed multiple
felonies of perjury while testifying as to the facts of the Patricia
Cornwell case.

Under oath and on the witness stand, Tom Roberts committed unmistakable
perjury, including perjury claiming he had never seen the Patricia
Cornwell extortion letter threatening book-burning against Sachs, even
though it is at the centre of the legal files in the original Patricia
Cornwell 'legal case'.

Roberts also commits felony perjury about the sticker on Dr Les Sachs'
novel, which was about Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn the books of
a Jewish author. Instead of the truth, Roberts lies under oath, and
tries to spread the Cornwell group's hoax that Sachs' sticker was making
'plagiarism accusations', which in fact were never made by Sachs.

As Thomas H Roberts is proven to be himself a perjurer in his attacks on
Sachs, regarding events where he falsely claimed to be 'representing'
Sachs in the first legal case with Patricia Cornwell, the Patricia
Cornwell legal cases against Sachs are also proven to be fraudulent,
null and void, along with the 'court orders' issued against Sachs.

To see the original Patricia Cornwell extortion letter against Sachs,
threatening the book-burning of a Jewish man's books, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/bc9c6e


To see scans of original Patricia Cornwell US court filings demanding
the book-burning of a Jew's books, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/505b1b


To see the scan of the official US courthouse copy of the book cover of
Dr Les Sachs' novel, with the sticker making reference to Patricia
Cornwell's book-burning threats - this scan completely debunking the lie
and hoax of media articles, falsely claiming that this book sticker was
about 'plagiarism accusations' - see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/015e6d


To see the official court transcript where the Cornwell case lawyer
Thomas H Roberts commits multiple counts of felony perjury, thus proving
that the Patricia Cornwell 'legal proceedings' against Dr Les Sachs are
fraudulent, null and void, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(6) There was no actual 'trial' in the first Patricia Cornwell legal
case against Sachs (and no 'trial' in the second US legal case either).
The first 'legal proceeding' ended a few weeks after it started, with
the announcement of a so-called 'settlement', which is clearly a
complete fraud.

The 'settlement agreement' is not even signed by the victim, Dr Les
(Leslie) Sachs, but only signed by US federal Judge Robert Payne, and by
lawyers who are both working for Patricia Cornwell, Conrad Shumadine and
Thomas 'Tom' Roberts.

Previously to being attacked by Patricia Cornwell, Dr Les Sachs had been
an anti-corruption author and journalist for many years, as well as a
political activist. At the time of these attacks, Sachs had no
significant assets, and nothing to lose by a full trial and an appeal of
illegal 'court orders'.

Nonetheless, according to this absurdly false 'settlement', the Cornwell
lawyers and federal judge, all claim what is literally impossible. They
claim that, after merely a few weeks of being 'sued by Patricia
Cornwell', that somehow, magically and for the great benefit of Patricia
Cornwell and her lawyers:
- that Dr Les Sachs 'suddenly' agreed to the permanent banning of his
own freedom of speech and freedom of press for the rest of his life;
- that Sachs agreed to have his publishing company and writing career
completely destroyed;
- that Sachs agreed to have his own personal reputation destroyed, and
not to respond to lies that were published about him;
- that Sachs agreed to a lifelong personal enslavement to Judge Robert
Payne, where Sachs could be personally jailed at any time under Judge
Payne's whim;
- and that Sachs agreed to spend the rest of his life paying several
hundred thousand dollars plus 18 per cent interest, to Judge Payne's
personal friend Thomas Roberts, and his partner Tim Schulte, two lawyers
with a fraudulent 'Freedom Foundation' who were working for Patricia
Cornwell.

It is literally impossible for Sachs to have 'agreed' to all this, as
there is no benefit to him to 'agree' to have his freedom of speech
banned and his reputation and publishing company destroyed, and yet pay
great sums of money for the rest of his life to Judge Payne's friend
Roberts with a fraudulent 'Foundation' that does not exist.

The only thing that explains this fraudulent 'settlement', is what is
also evident from the documents and court transcripts, that the
extortionists Roberts and Schulte, working for Patricia Cornwell,
threatened to have Dr Les Sachs illegally jailed, and tortured to death
in a jail cell. That is the only possible basis of this utterly
fraudulent 'settlement' benefiting only Patricia Cornwell and the US
lawyers and judges.

It is thus clear from the documents and court transcripts, that since
the entire so-called 'settlement' of the first Patricia Cornwell legal
case is an impossible fraud, consequently the entirety of both of the
Patricia Cornwell 'legal proceedings' against Sachs are frauds, with all
'court orders' against Sachs null and void.

Here is a US court transcript where the entire fraudulent settlement
scheme of the Cornwell lawyers is exposed, with Cornwell case lawyer
Thomas Roberts on the witness stand, and rather well torn apart by a
brave Dr Les Sachs, making a last stand inside of the USA, before being
forced to escape from America in order to save his life:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


(7) In 2007, the same group of US federal judges in Virginia, the '4th
Circuit', who held the first fraudulent proceeding as detailed above,
held a second in absentia 'legal proceeding' against Sachs in Belgium,
where he has been recently living as a political refugee. After his
arrival as a refugee in Europe in 2004, Dr Les Sachs became an
increasingly influential journalist about US legal corruption, and
Sachs' journalistic influence around the world and among US citizens,
had come to be seen as a major threat to the US regime.

Moreover, Patricia Cornwell was increasingly angry about the accurate
biography of Patricia Cornwell which Dr Les Sachs had published on the
web, informing many people about the scandals and sordid details of
Patricia Cornwell's past life, details which US corporate media had
agreed to hide as a reward for Cornwell's money contributions to the
Bushes and other US political figures.

The US federal judges were also increasingly angry at Dr Les Sachs for
his journalism on US legal corruption. Perhaps angriest of all was
dominant US 4th Circuit Appeals Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III, who missed
being appointed to be Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court, as a result
of an article published by Sachs, right at the very moment when
Wilkinson was being interviewed by President Bush for the Supreme Court
vacancy.

So Wilkinson and the other 4th Circuit judges, all stung badly by
Sachs' anti-corruption journalism, communally resolved to participate in
a new scheme to try to have Sachs destroyed and killed, even in his new
refugee home in Europe.

The US judges no longer have direct power over Dr Les Sachs, given that
he was able to successfully escape alive from US territory. But the CIA
and US government and judges, and Patricia Cornwell's own lawyers, they
did develop a plan to try to 'finish off' the anti-corruption journalist
Sachs, by holding yet another fake and fraudulent 'legal proceeding'
inside of America.

So in 2007, the Patricia Cornwell group and the US judges, with the
direct involvement as well of the CIA and the President Bush
administration, held this second 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, in
order to secure a new set of 'court orders' which:
- ordered Google and the major search engines (all US-based) to close
down Sachs' political blog, to shut down search engine access to Sachs'
political websites and journalism;
- gave Cornwell-linked media companies a new basis to spread lies and
slanders against Sachs based on this new 'legal proceeding';
- enabled the completion of the murder of Dr Les Sachs, because the
websites by which Sachs was defending and protecting himself, can no
longer be found via internet searches, and it is now much easier for US
agents or for Patricia Cornwell to finish the murder of Sachs, with
search engines hiding the truth about Sachs and how he came to be a
refugee in Europe.

This new legal proceeding was premised on 'enforcing' the orders of the
first legal proceeding, which has been proven fraudulent as above, and
thus any proceeding based on that - such as the 2007 'legal proceeding'
ordering the blocking of Sachs' sites from the internet search engines,
is also fraudulent and illegal, all of its 'court orders' also null and
void.

Like the first legal proceeding against Sachs, the second was also a
theatrical farce, with a one-day federal 'court hearing' designed to
generate false media stories to help Patricia Cornwell to slander her
victim, who was far away in safety in Belgium so the US judges could not
jail him and kill him.

In this second legal proceeding funded by Patricia Cornwell to attack
Sachs, DOJ staff note how Cornwell once again committed felony perjury.
This time the perjury was Cornwell inventing brand new and obviously
fake 'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' stories against Dr Les Sachs, who
had already been living as a political refugee in Europe since 2004, and
yet in 2007 Cornwell suddenly started to claim that this refugee in
Europe had been 'stalking' Patricia Cornwell inside the USA, even though
Sachs faces instant jailing upon his return to US borders. These new
out-of-the-blue 'stalking' accusations by Patricia Cornwell against
Sachs, have already been debunked as clear lies and hoaxes.

It is interesting to note that in the 1990s, Patricia Cornwell herself
was shown by Esquire Magazine to be a perverted lesbian stalker of
actress Jodie Foster, and since then Patricia Cornwell has been proven
by witness statements to be a sadistic and vengeful stalker of
heterosexual women, whom Cornwell tries to convince to have lesbian
affairs with herself.

For the Esquire magazine material on Patricia Cornwell's lesbian
stalking of actress Jodie Foster, as held within US Department of
Justice records, see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/80eb57

DOJ notes are that, also committing perjury in the 2007 Cornwell legal
proceeding, was an 'expert witness on stalking', who accepted money from
Patricia Cornwell, to give false court testimony that the journalism
websites of Dr Les Sachs constitute 'cyberstalking', because Sachs does
not stay quiet about the evidence that Patricia Cornwell and her lawyers
had threatened to murder him several years earlier.

Also noted by DOJ staff, is that this 2007 proceeding also involved
felony lies by Cornwell's lawyers, Joan Lukey of WilmerHale in Boston,
and James W 'Jimmy' Morris III of Virginia, who put false statements
into federal court papers, committing what DOJ calls 'obstruction of
justice' about the earlier crimes of Patricia Cornwell and her legal
team.

With these new episodes of perjury by Patricia Cornwell and her paid-for
'expert witness', and the false statements by Cornwell's lawyers Joan
Lukey and Jimmy Morris to commit obstruction of justice, according to
the DOJ sources, this 2007 trial is thus fraudulent, null and void just
like the earlier 2000 trial.

It's worth noting that both of these legal proceedings by Patricia
Cornwell, in 2007 and 2000, centred on spreading major lies and hoaxes
via US corporate media.

In 2007, the new hoax was Patricia Cornwell spreading absurdly false
'stalking' and 'cyberstalking' stories against Dr Les Sachs, the man
whom Cornwell had paid to threaten to murder, according to DOJ sources,
and who had been forced to take refuge in Europe in 2004.

Yet somehow Patricia Cornwell suddenly started to claim in 2007, that
this writer Sachs who had taken political refuge in Europe in 2004, had
been 'stalking' Cornwell even while Sachs was living as a refugee in the
Netherlands and Belgium. And somehow Cornwell and her lawyers had never
said anything about 'stalking' before they decided to hold this 2007
'legal proceeding' in Virginia, in order to block the websites of Sachs
from the internet.

The first proceeding in 2000, had centred on something different,
spreading a hoax that Sachs had made 'plagiarism' accusations against
Cornwell, when in fact Sachs never used this word, and the court record
shows clearly that it was Patricia Cornwell's threats to burn a Jewish
author's books, that directly fuelled the protests of Dr Les Sachs.

To see the scan of the official US courthouse copy of the book cover of
Dr Les Sachs' novel, with the sticker making reference to Patricia
Cornwell's book-burning threats - this scan completely debunking the lie
and hoax of US media articles, falsely claiming that this book sticker
was about 'plagiarism accusations' - see here:

http://mytinyurl.net/015e6d


(8) As seen above, there is clear proof that Dr Les Sachs faced illegal
jailing, and torture to death in a jail cell, with the US government
being unwilling to protect Sachs from harm. Under President Bush, US
authorities refused to prosecute the criminal acts proven here, such as
Patricia Cornwell and Thomas Roberts committing clear perjury, and
threatening to have Sachs tortured to death in a jail cell.

See here for the exposure of Thomas Roberts' crimes in fraudulently
posing as the lawyer for Dr Les Sachs while threatening to murder him:

http://mytinyurl.net/4cbd05


Also, it is very clear from thousands of e-mails in the evidence files,
that US lawyers have feared mafia-style revenge from US judges, if they
dare to represent Dr Les Sachs, or file any US legal papers regarding
the criminal acts done against him.

Some of these e-mails are from US lawyers who were immediately disbarred
(i.e., lost their right to practice law, by order of the judges), after
those lawyers had tried to speak out against US legal corruption. These
witnesses confirm that US lawyers are indeed under mafia-style threat
and menace, if they dare to represent a client like Dr Les Sachs.

It is clear that it is fraudulent for the US judges to hold a 'legal
proceeding' against a victim whom they threaten to illegally jail and
murder if he returns to the country to argue his case, and where they
are also threatening to disbar or otherwise personally harm any US
lawyer who would dare to represent this victim who took refuge in
Europe.

Thus, with the 2007 'trial' held in absentia against Dr Les Sachs while
he was living as a refugee in Belgium, it is clear that this 'legal
proceeding' is illegal and fraudulent, all its orders null and void.


(9) For the 2007 'legal proceeding', Sachs was never even served with
legal papers. The US judges and lawyers have no address for Sachs, and
Sachs now lives under security at secret locations in Belgium. The US
judges and lawyers merely resorted to sending Dr Les Sachs their new
fraudulent 'court orders' by e-mail, with Sachs continually responding
that these e-mails were criminal harassment.

It is noteworthy that the e-mails from the US judges taunting Sachs,
with how they were blocking his websites from the internet to help
murder him, came right from the official US courthouse e-mail accounts.

To the harassing e-mails he received from the US 4th Circuit judges in
2007, Dr Les Sachs finally e-mailed a response to these US judges which
seemed to deter them from directly harassing him by e-mail any further.
Sachs wrote back to the judges:

« If one believed in the death penalty and hanging, then Judge Moon
would certainly deserve to be sentenced by a court to hang on a gallows
with Judge Payne, their bodies swinging outside the courthouse from
nooses, as an example to other corrupt judges. But I do not believe in
the death penalty, which your corrupt US judges take such perverted
pleasure in imposing on innocent blacks and Hispanics and other
minorities.

But Judge Moon certainly does deserve to be in prison for the rest of
his life for conducting this fake trial and taking part in these
terrorist criminal acts against me.

You courthouse staff who are harassing me with these e-mails, you be
sure and tell Judge Moon and Judge Payne and Judge Hudson, and whatever
other federal judges are all involved in these acts of terrorism in
support of the Patricia Cornwell bribery and campaign money -

Judge Moon and all you other gangsters, take all your court papers and
illegal court orders, you just shove all your court papers and illegal
"court orders" each right up your criminal rectum. I don't read these
dozens of e-mails you criminal gangsters are sending me, and it is up
the rectum of Judge Moon and his fellow judges where these e-mails of
yours belong. »

Clearly the refugee journalist Dr Les Sachs, even under threat of death,
still has some wit about him.


(10) The 2007 in absentia trial against Sachs, to block his websites and
to enable the completion of his murder, was held by the same 4th Circuit
US federal judges who are named in a standing Appeal by Sachs as legal
parties to the ongoing case.

This Appeal was originally filed and dated 3 April 2004, and was re-
filed both with the full panel of US federal 4th Circuit Appeals judges,
as well as with the appropriate panel of the US Supreme Court, all of
whom have refused to respond to Sachs' 125-count catalogue of criminal
acts involving the 4th Circuit judges themselves, as well as Patricia
Cornwell, her lawyers, and other parties in the attacks on Sachs.

This standing, and still unanswered Appealm is posted online in full. It
is fraudulent and illegal for the same judges to hold a 'trial' in a
case in which they are named as a party. The full text of this standing
US Supreme Court and Appeals Court filing can be found here:

http://mytinyurl.net/ccf8ce


(11) Dr Les Sachs had already published extensive journalism about
corruption by both US 4th Circuit district and Appeals judges, and how
these judges are involved in threatening to murder him.

The journalism of Dr Les Sachs involved not only the wrongdoing of the
lower-level US Federal Judge Robert Payne who supervised the first of
the fraudulent 'legal proceedings' against Sachs. It also involved
journalism about the 4th Circuit higher-level Appeals judges generally,
and above all, an important article about the most powerful senior judge
on the entire Appeals panel, Judge J Harvie Wilkinson III.

Just as Wilkinson was being interviewed by former US President George
Bush, to be the next Chief Justice of the US Supreme Court - the highest
judge in the entire United States - Dr Les Sachs published an article
about Wilkinson, "Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson III, His Bribery Cover-Up
for 4th Circuit Judges". Apparently as a result of this article, and the
scandal that would result if Wilkinson were to face confirmation
hearings regarding elevation to the Supreme Court, Wilkinson was passed
over for the job, and President Bush instead chose Chief Justice John G
Roberts, ironically enough a Harvard classmate of Dr Les Sachs himself.

(The article about Judge Wilkinson was ordered to be blocked from the
internet search engines, by the US judges working under Wilkinson's
supervision. You can still find the article via at www (point) banned-
in-america (net). Note: Do not put this site as a direct web page link,
as any web page listing it may be blocked from internet search results.)

All this means that these judges must not hold any proceedings about
matters in which they are personally involved as objects of the
journalism of Dr Les Sachs. They were obligated to have any new case
involving Sachs transferred to another Circuit altogether.

Appeals Judge Wilkinson will likely bear deep personal hatred for Sachs
for the rest of his life, due to Wilkinson missing the appointment to be
a historic Chief Justice of the entire USA. Wilkinson is said to bear a
personal wish and desire to want Sachs murdered, as well as banned from
the internet.

Yet Wilkinson authorised the lower judges under him, to hold the entire
2007 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, to spread smears against Sachs
and to order the blocking of Sachs' websites, despite the fact it was
fraudulent for the judges to do so, in this case where the lower court
judges would face revenge from Wilkinson if they did not do harm to
Sachs in ways that satisfy Wilkinson's desire for revenge.


(12) With the clear documentation that the US judges and government are
involved in politically-motivated threats to torture and murder the
journalist Dr Les (Leslie) Sachs, and to take his human rights away, it
is clear that Sachs is a victim of crimes of 'terrorism' by the US
government, by both the European and US definitions of terrorism.

The 2007 US federal 'legal proceeding' against Sachs, seeking to do
further harm to Sachs by way of extending earlier criminal acts of
terrorism, is thus a clear violation of international law.

Moreover, the US federal judges in 2007 violated international law and
treaties regarding open access to the internet, by issuing illegal
orders upon Google and the other major internet search engines which
have US offices, instructing them to block the European journalism sites
of Dr Les Sachs from readers around the world.

This is a direct criminal attack on the rights of European citizens and
on Europe itself, with US judges directly seizing control of what
political material Europeans are allowed to find and read when they
search Google or other dominant search engines.

Thus, the US 2007 'legal proceeding' against Dr Les Sachs, ordering the
blocking of his European websites from readers around the world, so that
Sachs can be slandered and killed, and the world deprived of reading his
political journalism, is thus an illegal and fraudulent proceeding, a
criminal act in direct violation of international treaties both on the
subject of terrorism and on open control of the internet.


For more background on the above:


Two EU Writers Under Threat of Murder: Roberto Saviano and Dr Les Sachs

http://lombardia.indymedia.org/node/13581 - also at:
http://mytinyurl.net/10e98


US Blocking Belgian Journalism Websites to Help Murder US Dissident in
Brussels

http://www.indymedia.be/en/node/31259 - also at:
http://mytinyurl.net/f35b4e


- Dan Hajidah

Abdan "Dan" Hajidah is a researcher who has supplied documented source
material to journalists at leading news outlets in Europe. He spreads
his time among several northern European countries, including the
Netherlands, Denmark, Sweden and Belgium.

Dan can be reached by e-mail at: dh-news@europe.com


This is published with a maximally open Creative Commons Licence:
<a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/"><img
alt="Creative Commons License" style="border-width:0"
src="http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/3.0/80x15.png"/></a><br/>T
his
work is licenced under a <a rel="license"
href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/">Creative Commons
Licence</a>.



[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten