TURMEL: Terry Parker appeals Canada Post marijuana seizure
Von: johnturmel (johnturmel@yahoo.com) [Profil]
Datum: 30.10.2009 20:45
Message-ID: <dc3d7e20-dca5-48f3-974c-0084d946cbb8@15g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.conspiracy alt.drugscan.legal can.politics alt.fan.john-turmel
Datum: 30.10.2009 20:45
Message-ID: <dc3d7e20-dca5-48f3-974c-0084d946cbb8@15g2000yqy.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.conspiracy alt.drugscan.legal can.politics alt.fan.john-turmel
JCT: Terry filed his notice of appeal of the Tulloch decision which dismissed Terry's appeal against the Clement decision refusing to return Terry's marijuana seized by Canada Post. Court File No. COURT OF APPEAL FOR ONTARIO Between: Terrance Parker Appellant-Accused and Her Majesty the Queen Respondent/Plaintiff NOTICE OF APPEAL PARTICULARS: Place of Judgment: Brampton Name of Court: Superior Court of Justice Case File No: CR-08-2484 Section 24 (Return of controlled substance) Name of Judge: Mr. Justice Tulloch Date of judgment: Sep 30 2009 THE APPELLANT APPEALS the refusal to return the controlled substance to Appellant as a question of law alone. THE GROUNDS OF THE APPEAL are that the prohibitions on possession and cultivation of marihuana are no longer known to law and must be re-enacted by Parliament because: 1) the Oct 7 2003 Hitzig decision did not resurrect the prohibitions once struck down which only Parliament can do, POLCOA (Parliament Only Legislates, Courts Only Abrogate) after: a) the Ontario Parker decision invalidated the CDSA prohibition on possession of marijuana since Aug 1 2001; or b) the Alberta Krieger decision invalidated the CDSA prohibitions on cultivation and possession of marijuana since Mar 18 2003; or 2) if it is held that the Hitzig Court did resurrect the old prohibition which remains known to law: a) the recent Sfetkopoulos and Beren rulings found that the re- enactment on Dec 3 2003 of the unconstitutional conditions which had been struck down in Hitzig had once again rendered the exemption process unconstitutional; or b) the Mar 15 2001 decision of Justice Pitt extends the exemption granted by the Ontario Court of Appeal to Mr. Parker from the criminal prohibitions until the government has complied with the court's ruling until it is overturned on appeal; c) evidence showing 1 in 60 Ontario doctors participating makes the exemption illusory. THE RELIEF SOUGHT is an Order declaring that the prohibitions on the possession and cultivation of marijuana remain unknown to law since they were deemed repealed and not re-enacted by Parliament. APPELLANT'S ADDRESS FOR SERVICE: 2209-55 Triller Ave. Toronto, Ontario, M6R-2H6 Tel: 416-533-7756 Fax: 519-753-0645 E: terryparkerjr@sympatico.ca Dated at Toronto on Oct 30 2009 Terrance Parker TO: The Registrar of the Ontario Court of Appeal JCT: So Terry continues on to Ontario's highest court to overruled the Hitzig and J.P. decisions on the court bringing the marijuana prohibitions back to life instead of Parliament.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
