Re: Fort Hood

In article <4AF4F4DC.4F586230@yahoo.co.uk>,
Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' ) <tribuyltinfpant@yahoo.co.uk>
wrote:
>
>Should the court revist Brandenburg?:
>
>#begin quote 395 U.S. 444, 447 (1969)
>[T]he constitutional guarantees of free speech and free press do
>not permit a State to forbid or proscribe advocacy of the use of
>force or of law violation except where such advocacy is directed to
>inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to
>incite or produce such action.
>#end quote

Servicepeople do not have free speech rights.  (A lieutenant who
refused to deploy and spoke against president Bush ended up serving
more time for speaking against president Bush than for refusing to
deploy.)

--
Please reply to:            | "Any sufficiently advanced incompetence is
pciszek at panix dot com    |  indistinguishable from malice."
Autoreply is disabled       |

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten

Bill Bonde { 'by a commodius vicus of recirculation' ) (07.11.2009 17:49)