Re: To bring this back ON TOPIC...
Von: Paul Clarke (jim_caerleon@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.09.2008 00:26
Message-ID: <HaEvk.93$1x6.20@edtnps82>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.james-bond
Datum: 04.09.2008 00:26
Message-ID: <HaEvk.93$1x6.20@edtnps82>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.james-bond
Eric Grayson wrote: > Interesting article that makes a lot of the same point I made: > > http://www.dvdtalk.com/dvdsavant/s2644fight.html > > Eric (I never said that, yes you did, Hitler, I think God made me do it) I agree with many of the points the author makes, and have long complained about MTV-style Moulinex quick-cutting, which spoiled the otherwise excellent Bourne films for me. However, CR was, for me, assuredly *not* one of the recent spate of offenders in the incomprehensible action sequence dept. In fact, I found it to be refreshingly classical in its editing, as opposed to the dire Avid-farts found in DAD. -- “…I don't want to push my chips forward and go out and meet something I don't understand. You can say it's my job to fight it, but I don't know what it is anymore. More than that, I don't want to know. A man would have to put his soul at hazard. He would have to say, ‘O.K., I'll be part of this world.’” http://www.filmfanaticoasis.blogspot.com/[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- EDell (04.09.2008 02:32)
