Re: To bring this back ON TOPIC...
Von: Paul Clarke (jim_caerleon@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 04.09.2008 22:36
Message-ID: <_EXvk.227$1x6.51@edtnps82>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.james-bond
Datum: 04.09.2008 22:36
Message-ID: <_EXvk.227$1x6.51@edtnps82>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.james-bond
Philip Gerrard wrote: > To me, quick cutting is like CGI: you have to deal with it on a case-by-case > basis rather than applying blanket rules, which I think this article does. > Yes, of course there have been many, many over-edited and trendily flashy > action movies over the last few years, but imposing universal standards, > derived from past movies, from which no movie should ever deviate is hugely > counter-productive IMO. I agree with your basic point here, but I think the problem is that this quick-cut editing style is so *prevalent* in action films (at least western action films). Essentially, this style is fashionable, and it is automatically applied to all action sequences without regard for if it fits the film or not. In time, when quick cutting has lots its hipness, it will hopefully be relegated to the cinematic toolbox and the great editors and filmmakers, those that we can consider to be artists, will pull it out to achieve a certain desired aesthetic in a sequence. Right now it is overused as a tool, likely because some filmmakers lack confidence and do not want their films to be perceived as unhip or "old school." This same attitude, IMHO, infected DAD, with the producers and director afraid of Bond becoming old school among the modern crop of quick-cut action films. The cutting in the ice lake car chase is atrocious, almost ruining this already OTT sequence. I don't agree with *ahem* certain other posters that quick-cutting similarly ruined the stairwell fight from CR. The cutting there was fast, but entirely appropriate to the tempo of the action, plus I'm 41 and certifiably old school but had no problem following the action. Compare the editing there with that of the parkour chase from the beginning, which is fast but offers panoptic views of the action so the viewer is always oriented as to who is doing what to whom. In other words, the editors pulled out a faster cutting style when it was needed, and had the confidence to not trend-hop and apply this style to the whole film. -- “…I don't want to push my chips forward and go out and meet something I don't understand. You can say it's my job to fight it, but I don't know what it is anymore. More than that, I don't want to know. A man would have to put his soul at hazard. He would have to say, ‘O.K., I'll be part of this world.’” http://www.filmfanaticoasis.blogspot.com/[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Phil Gerrard (05.09.2008 01:36)
- Phil Gerrard (05.09.2008 02:16)
- Adam H. Kerman (05.09.2008 02:33)
- Phil Gerrard (05.09.2008 02:48)
- Paul Clarke (05.09.2008 16:07)
- Phil Gerrard (08.09.2008 02:06)
- Paul Clarke (05.09.2008 16:13)
