Re: #Shook: Why Do We Have to Listen to this Crap? Republicans Should Sit Down and Shut Up!
Von: nobody (nobody@nowhere.com) [Profil]
Datum: 03.11.2009 12:01
Message-ID: <d730f5hqvvmvvic0djceh1at1s403aavje@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.rush-limbaughtalk.politics.misc alt.society.liberalism
Datum: 03.11.2009 12:01
Message-ID: <d730f5hqvvmvvic0djceh1at1s403aavje@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.fan.rush-limbaughtalk.politics.misc alt.society.liberalism
On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 20:27:01 -0800 (PST), Milt <milt.shook@gmail.com> wrote: >On Nov 2, 8:22 am, nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote: >> On Sun, 01 Nov 2009 13:46:15 GMT, linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott >> >> >> >> Linder) wrote: >> >Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >>On Oct 31, 4:57 am, linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote: >> >>> Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >On Oct 29, 6:32=A0am, linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) wrote: >> >>> >> Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >On Oct 26, 6:30=3DA0am, linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Linder) w >> >>rote: >> >>> >> >> Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >On Oct 25, 5:29=3D3DA0am, linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott Lind >> >>er) w= >> >>> >rote: >> >>> >> >> >> Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >> >> >> >On Oct 24, 5:02=3D3D3DA0am, linder....@osu.edu (Jeffrey Scott >> >> Lind= >> >>> >er) w=3D >> >>> >> >rote: >> >>> >> >> >> >> Milt <milt.sh...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> ><mercy snip> >> >> >>> >> >> >> No I didn't Milt. =3D3DA0It was you: >> >> >>> >> >> >> On 10/15/09 you typed: >> >> >>> >> >> >> "Everyone in this country, without exception, needs resources fo >> >>r f= >> >>> >ood >> >>> >> >> >> and shelter. If you have two political parties; one that will he >> >>lp >> >>> >> >> >> provide those basic resources, and one who will take them away, >> >>and >> >>> >> >> >> you vote for the one who will take them away, because he also be >> >>lie= >> >>> >ves >> >>> >> >> >> only a man and a woman can get married, you are voting against y >> >>our >> >>> >> >> >> interests. Period. " =3D3DA0--Milt Shook >> >> >>> >> >> >> Now surely you can come up with a quote of mine that predates th >> >>at >> >>> >> >> >> can't you Milt? =3D3DA0You wouldn't be lying again would you M >> >>ilt? >> >> >>> >> >> >It's a fucking hypothetical, you fucktard, >> >> >>> >> >> It is? =3DA0Funny how that "hypothetical", as you call it, is the >> >> whol= >> >>> >e >> >>> >> >> basis for your article. >> >> >>> >> >No it's not. >> >> >>> >Note the dodge. Does that mean you admit you don't understand my main >> >>> >argument? >> >> >>> No dodge Milt. I get tired of answering the same lame question over >> >>> and over. >> >> >>Again demonstrating that lack of an irony gene. >> >> >>You NEVER get tired of pretending to answer the same questions over >> >>and over. For shit's sake, Jeffrey; it's your entire shtick. You keep >> >>offering the same lame ass answers over and over again, until we're >> >>forced to shake or heads and walk away. >> >> >>You STILL have not listed the alleged reforms of the $2.7 trillion >> >>health insurance system that are contained in those reform bills. >> >> >I did for one of the bills listed that you said never even existed >> >Milt. Just because you don't like the reform they offer doesn't mean >> >they don't offer reform. >> >> That's *exactly* how Miltie thinks... > >Words mean things. The word "reform" has a specific meaning. Go look >it up instead of pretending to know what it means. > Just for you Miltie: http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/reform "1 a : to put or change into an improved form or condition " Making it possible for some who don't currently have insurance to have it would certainly be an improved condition. >What the Republicans have offered does NOT meet the actual definition >of reform. You mean *your* defintion.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]