Wal-Mart Sued After False Child Porn Allegations
Von: Fred B. Brown (fredbbrown@nowhere.com) [Profil]
Datum: 20.09.2009 14:09
Message-ID: <4ab61b14$0$92389$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.incest alt.fan.yardbird alt.activism.children
Datum: 20.09.2009 14:09
Message-ID: <4ab61b14$0$92389$bb4e3ad8@newscene.com>
Newsgroup: alt.support.incest alt.fan.yardbird alt.activism.children
Imagine going on a vacation and taking pictures of the entire trip. When you return home, you take the memory card to your local Wal-Mart to get the pictures developed. Instead of getting your pictures, you are accused of taking inappropriate pictures of your daughters and they are taken into protective custody. Can't imagine that could happen? It did to Lisa and Anthony Demaree of Peoria, Arizona. Read more at: http://www.kidglue.com/2009/09/18/wal-mart-sued-after-false-child-porn-allegations/ The pedo hysterics are alive and well. Why did it take a month to determine the photos were not child porn? The US Supreme Court was very clear in a 2003 decision as to what constituted child porn.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Morton Davis (20.09.2009 17:31)
