Re: [RFD] An Anti-Godwin?

On Mon, 12 May 2008 18:45:03 -0400, dave hillstrom wrote:

> On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:25:12 -0400, mimus <tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 14:02:46 -0400, mimus wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 10:43:44 -0700, Aratzio wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, 12 May 2008 13:40:22 -0400, in the land of
>>>> alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, mimus
<tinmimus99@hotmail.com>
>>>> got double secret probation for writing:
>>>>
>>>>> I was just involved in a discussion in the *.politics groups, and a
>>>>> gentleman there replied to a post of mine in the course of a thread
>>>>> with the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> "Back to the gas chamber, I think Hitler missed you."
>>>>>
>>>>> Isn't that-- might one say-- might one dare say-- an anti-Godwin?
>>>>
>>>> Nope, full on Godwin.
>>>
>>> But it's not, even implicitly, calling me a Nazi-- rather the reverse
>>> (although maybe a "Zio-Nazi", come to think of it, a phrase
popular with
>>> posters presenting philosophies similar to that of the gentleman in
>>> question).
>>>
>>> Are you yourself implying that any mention of Hitler/Nazis qualifies under
>>> Godwin's Rule?
>>
>> Hmf.
>>
>> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/legends/godwin/
>>
>> leaves me still unconvinced that what we have here is not an
>> "anti-Godwin", although part 4 item 2 is close.
>>
>> And furthermore the Hell there aren't any pods.
>
> are you a pod grower, mimus?

I was of course. to the basement wher the lovely pods.  which in peace
come.  to me mimus my opinion.  Yes.

Arx.

--
tinmimus99@hotmail.com

smeeter 11 or maybe 12

mp 10

mhm 29x13

What the fuck are you TALKING about flunker?

< Billy Big Balls
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]