Apparently, Jew Lieberman truly just wants “nothing” when it comes to health care reform!
Von: My Name (no@e-mail.com.invalid) [Profil]Datum: 02.11.2009 19:34
Message-ID: <Xns9CB775604BA1EMyIdToken@walks.like.a.duck>
Followup-to: alt.conspiracy,alt.religion.christian.last-days,misc.education.home-school.christian,alt.religion.christian.biblestudy,alt.religion.christianity,alt.religion.christian,sci.med.nursing,,alt.health
Newsgroup: alt.healthsci.med.nursing alt.religion.christian alt.religion.christianity alt.religion.christian.biblestudymisc.education.home-school.christian alt.religion.christian.last-days alt.conspiracy
Der Autor dieses Postings wünscht keine Archivierung. Es wird am 02.12. aus dem Archiv entfernt.
Think Progress Lieberman Would Prefer 'Nothing' To Health Care Reform With A Public Option By Matt Corley on Nov 1st, 2009 at 11:40 am For months now, media critics like Media Matters' Jamison Foser have pointed out that the press have often demonstrated a double standard when questioning opponents and proponents of the public option, only asking advocates about whether they think it is "better to have nothing than to have a plan that does not include the public option." On CBS' Face The Nation today, however, host Bob Schieffer put the question to Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT), who claims that he is "all for health care reform, but is threatening to join a Republican filibuster to stop any reform bill that has a public option. "But wouldn't that mean that you might wind up with nothing instead of something?" asked Schieffer. Lieberman responded by saying that supporters of the public option are "stopping us from getting something done" because they're making the option "the litmus test." Pressed again by Schieffer, Lieberman admitted that he would prefer "nothing": SCHIEFFER: But is what you're also saying is that nothing is better than a government health insurance, or a health insurance reform that includes a public option? Nothing is better than that? LIEBERMAN: Well, the truth is that nothing is better than that because I think we ought to follow, if I may, the doctor's oath in Congress as we deal with health care reform, do no harm. To support his claim that the public option would do harm, Lieberman said that the Congressional Budget Office found that under the House's health care plan, premiums for the public option would be higher than the average premium in private plans in the exchange. But as TPMDC's Brian Beutler reported, this is actually an argument for a more robust public option. Watch it: In his discussion with Schieffer, Lieberman acted as though the public option was the only thing stopping him from supporting health care reform. But this ignores the fact that Lieberman opposed the Baucus bill last month, which did not contain a public option. Apparently, Lieberman truly just wants "nothing" when it comes to health care reform. http://thinkprogress.org/2009/11/01/liberman-nothing-public-option/ -- A government, of Israel, by Israel, and, for: Israel. But all things that are reproved are made manifest by the light: for whatsoever doth make manifest is light. The light shineth in darkness; and the darkness comprehended it not. The light of the body is the eye: if therefore thine eye be single, thy whole body shall be full of light. But if thine eye be evil, thy whole body shall be full of darkness. If therefore the light that is in thee be darkness, how great is that darkness! Awake thou that sleepest, and arise from the dead, and Christ shall give thee light. For my yoke is easy, and my burden is light.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]