Re: GOOGLE Resists Ending Its Programs Enabling CommieChinks To Sensor & Cut Off Citizens' Internet Access!

Blah blah blah! Stupid stuff. Let's have some fun! Call me at
www.thailovelinks.com .
Here are my websites:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/64156901@N00/

http://www.flickr.com/photos/meichi_cunt_aka_abianchen_filthy_smelly_pussy/

You like?



On Jun 29, 9:26 am, John Fartlington Poopnagle
<perryneh...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> It's all about the money ... BIG money ... but Google denies any
> "connection."
>
> "What, us?"
>
> Kinda in the spirit of "Google Help."  (No noose is good noose.)
>
> -----------------
> "China's Information Dam"
>
> "Should Yahoo, Google and Microsoft help the censors?"
>
> Editorial
> Monday, June 29, 2009
>
> "IT IS NOT our job to fix the Chinese government," Yahoo CEO Carol
> Bartz said last week. Maybe not. But search engines operating in China
> face a dilemma come July. Starting Wednesday, China is embarking on a
> broad initiative to clamp down on Web content the government views as
> obscene, billing these efforts as a fight against pornography. For
> Chinese officials, there has always been an overlap between
> pornography and references to politically sensitive topics such as the
> Falun Gong and Tiananmen Square. June traditionally marks a crackdown
> in China's Web censorship as the country brings down sites such as You
> Tube (inaccessible since March) and Twitter for the anniversary of the
> Tiananmen Square massacre. But more is in the works.
>
> The plan? Fine and shut down all sites offering unapproved information
> on sexual health, command Google to close access to foreign Web sites
> and push for the pre-installation of censorship software called "Green
> Dam" on all computers. As this list reveals, China's Web censorship
> efforts go far beyond the stated goal of protecting against
> pornography.
>
> Foreign companies are drawn to China's market of more than 200 million
> Internet users. But the conditions of doing business in China are
> complicated: Content providers must agree to abide by China's
> draconian restrictions on the kind of results they can show. Both Bing
> and Google's sites acknowledge that results have been removed. Their
> justification is simple: If we don't do it, someone else will.
>
> But this is not necessarily true. In 1996, state news agency Xinhua
> tried to place restrictions on breaking financial news, moving to
> prohibit all stories not vetted by its propaganda machine. A concerted
> pushback by the international media and other stockholders prevailed
> against the initiative.
>
> This time, the State Department and industry groups are pushing back
> against China's Green Dam censorship software. They must stand firm,
> and search engines should join them. The industry can offer China
> better alternatives to meet its avowed aim of limiting access to
> pornography. But closing access to sexual-health Web sites is both
> wrong and dangerous. Fining people who fail to meet government
> criteria for the information they post could have devastating
> repercussions. And enhancing China's ability to persecute those who
> seek freedom is not forgivable.
>
> It may not be companies' job to fix the Chinese government. But if
> they choose to do business in China, it is their job to serve the
> Chinese people.
>
> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/06/28/AR200...
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]