nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: ~~ Larry just can't stop Lying -- Arrested on Suspicion of Resisting Arrest <= and other nonsensical police abuses ~~

Von: ¥ UltraMan ¥ (ultra@man.jp) [Profil]
Datum: 18.10.2007 07:07
Message-ID: <5no806Fj6louU1@mid.individual.net>
Newsgroup: uk.legal rec.motorcycles misc.legal can.legal aus.legal alt.law-enforcement
Larry wrote:
> In article <5nnuobFjc2aeU1@mid.individual.net>,
> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>
>> Larry wrote:
>>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>> "¥ UltraMan ¥" <ultra@man.jp> wrote in
>>>>>> Deadrat wrote:
>>>>>>> "_ Prof. Jonez _" <theprof@jonez.net> wrote
>>>>>>>> <.p.jm@see_my_sig_for_address.com> wrote in
message
>>>>>>>>> TNKev <IyamTNKev@IyamwhatIyam.yam>
>>>>>>>>>> ¥ UltraMan ¥ wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Kent Wills wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> "¥ UltraMan ¥"
<ultra@man.jp> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Incidents reported by Lone Tree
Police
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> MAN PARKS MOTORCYCLE ILLEGALLY
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Police received a complaint of a
motorcycle parked in a
>>>>>>>>>>>>> handicapped parking space in front
of The Cheesecake
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Factory at Park Meadows shopping
center, 8401 Park
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Meadows Center Drive, at about 1
p.m. Oct. 1. A
>>>>>>>>>>>>> 23-year-old security guard stated
the driver of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> motorcycle, later identified as a
21-year-old Parker man,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> tried to park in a no parking zone
in front of one of the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mall entrances. The security guard
told him he could not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> park there, and the 21-year- old
then parked his
>>>>>>>>>>>>> motorcycle in the handicapped
space. When the security
>>>>>>>>>>>>> guard told the man he could not
park there either, he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> said, "Get a cop then."
When an officer arrived and asked
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the 21-year- old for his driver's
license, he said, "You
>>>>>>>>>>>>> don't need to see my license. I
know my rights." The
>>>>>>>>>>>>> officer told him he would be
arrested if he did not
>>>>>>>>>>>>> surrender his license, and he said,
"Fine, take me to
>>>>>>>>>>>>> jail." The officer tried to
detain the man, but he
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resisted arrest and received a blow
to his right leg with
>>>>>>>>>>>>> the officer's baton. He was
arrested on suspicion of
>>>>>>>>>>>>> resisting arrest and obstructing
police.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Funny, how after a cop says 'If you dont' do such
and such,
>>>>>>>>> you're going to jail', and you say 'Bugger off, I
know my
>>>>>>>>> rights', you end up going to jail.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Funny how after a cop says "Bend over I'm gonna
fuck you in the
>>>>>>>> ass", you grab yer ankles and say "Thank you
sir, may I have
>>>>>>>> another?"
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> While I don't KNOW the applicable laws
of the jurisdiction,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yet you'll open your ignorant pie-hole
anyway.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'll go out on a limb and say it's
illegal to park in a
>>>>>>>>>>>> handicap parking space without
displaying some sort of
>>>>>>>>>>>> permit.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Yep, it's a parking infraction. Not an
arrestable offence.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> And while operating a vehicle, including parking
it, you are
>>>>>>>>> subject to all motor vehicle laws.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> And after you've parked it?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Circumstantial evidence. Trout. Milk.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cat. Hat.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Spontaneous generation.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Flat Earth
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Geocentricism
>>>>>
>>>>> Hmmm.  After considering the results of your word association
>>>>> test, I find that you're a very disturbed individual.  Get help.
>>>>
>>>> Is that your learned professional diagnosis ?
>>>>
>>>> What "help" do you recommend, specifically ?
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> And the topic you should be addressing is temporal continuity.
>>>>>> While at some point someone probably drove the vehicle to it's
>>>>>> current location, perhaps even the subject of this story, at
some
>>>>>> point in time after he parks it he is no longer operating it,
and
>>>>>> hence not subject to motor vehicle laws.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To argue otherwise is to suggest that people who DRIVE to a
bar,
>>>>>> then proceed to get drunk in the bar, are somehow still subject
>>>>>> to motor vehicle laws while inside the bar, and hence in some
>>>>>> pre-DUI pre-offensive state, or perhaps a post-driving current
>>>>>> intoxicated state, or one of Kent Will's quantum
transpositional
>>>>>> transtemporal superposition.
>>>>>
>>>>> On the other hand, drunks who have pulled to the side of the road
>>>>> have been arrested for drunk driving even though they weren't
>>>>> driving at the time they were arrested.
>>>>
>>>> Yep, INSIDE the vehicle, in possession of the keys to operate
>>>> said vehicle.
>>>>
>>>> Now how many drunks inside a bar have been arrested for DUI
>>>> because their car was parked in the nearby lot ?
>>>
>>> If someone saw them park the car and walk into the bar already
>>> intoxicated, they most certainly could be arrested.
>>
>> ROTFLMAO !!
>>
>> Do tell Larry, do tell how, exactly "someone who saw" them enter the
>> bar would know, to a legal standard, that they were "already
>> intoxicated" to the point of DUI.
>
> Because after

After what Larry?

Being arrested for drinking in a bar?

LOL!


> someone is arrested for DWI, they're given a blood
> alcohol test.
>
> Did you really not know that?

I think you're drunk Larry ... shall we have you arrested and forced
to give blood ?





[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten