Re: Playing for sympathy or what?

"Greegor" <Greegor47@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:03aa998a-8ad9-4b8a-9365-a9b19b83b44d@a22g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
> WHO brought up this dead baby in the newsgroups, and WHY?

"Roger," posting as...well, three aliases ago ("Lio Convoy",) out of
nowhere.

He accepted all his "friends'" expressions of sympathy, then it came out
there had never been any mention of wife, pregnancy, nothing, ever.

Then, posters saying they'd love to believe him, but just couldn't.  Too
many lies, they said, and no evidence whatsoever.

Then hatred, as so many realized they'd been simply scammed, their heartfelt
sympathies evoked by a sociopathic fraudster.

Then, over to AUK with a new name, then another after being busted for
defrauding AUK's voting scheme.

Tossed temporarily, then permanently,  the "FNVW" expressing regret that
he'd ever allowed the troll to vote at all.

Then, less significantly, the rest of AUKs sheep towing the line.  They all
hate the creep.

Imagine someone so worthless that AUKtards deem one of their own too low to
bother with.  Whew!!

> I could see somebody thinking it's a fiction.

Many did.  It's all in the Google archives.  Wills/Roger stake out the
lowest end of Usenet and the "free-speech" contingent.

The AUKtards figured out - after a looooong time - that such garbage will
eventually make it bad for them all.
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]