nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Bill Bonde has gone back into really stupid mode ... Simpsondidn't KIDNAP anybody fercrisesakes!!!

Von: Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who brought the gun'' ) (tributyltinpaint@yahoo.co.uk) [Profil]
Datum: 07.10.2008 19:59
Message-ID: <48EBA39D.4CB2F91B@yahoo.co.uk>
Newsgroup: uk.legal talk.politics.misc misc.legal alt.true-crime alt.law-enforcement alt.activism.death-penalty

"Reality_Check©" wrote:
>
> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who brought
> the gun'' ) wrote:
> > "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >>
> >> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who brought
> >> the gun'' ) wrote:
> >>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy who
> >>>> brought the gun'' ) wrote:
> >>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than the guy
who
> >>>>>> brought the gun'' ) wrote:
> >>>>>>> "Reality_Check©" wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no more time for him than
the guy who
> >>>>>>>> brought the gun'' ) wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Donna Evleth wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> From: "Bill Bonde { ''Free OJ, no
more time for him than the
> >>>>>>>>>>> guy who brought the gun'' )"
<tributyltinpaint@yahoo.co.uk>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Organization: Our legacy is not the
lives we lived but the
> >>>>>>>>>>> lives we leave to those who  come
after us.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Newsgroups:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
alt.activism.death-penalty,alt.law-enforcement,alt.true-crime,misc.legal,talk.
> >>>>>>>>>>> politics.misc,uk.legal
> >>>>>>>>>>> Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 00:24:55 +0100
> >>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: Bill Bonde has gone back
into really stupid
> >>>>>>>>>>> mode ... Simpson didn't   KIDNAP 
anybody fercrisesakes!!!
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> It isn't even a crime to be
> >>>>>>>>>>> addicted to drugs.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> But it is a crime to possess illegal
drugs.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Which I'm sure you know isn't a requirement to
be addicted to
> >>>>>>>>> them.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> God damn you are one pig-ignorant imbecile, aren't
you boy?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> So tell us how one can be addicted to drugs
without possessing
> >>>>>>>> those drugs?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Rush Limbaugh was addicted to prescription medications
when he
> >>>>>>> was in rehab. At that time, he had no access, at least
illegal
> >>>>>>> access, to the drugs.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> While Rush Limpballs got himself addicted, he did possess,
ipso
> >>>>>> facto, the illegal drugs he obtained via prescription
fraud.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> But we weren't talking about any period of time. We were
talking
> >>>>> about your claim that it was necessary to have (at every
specific
> >>>>> instance of time) illegal drugs to be addicted to drugs.
That's
> >>>>> not true. It's not a crime to be addicted to illegal drugs.
> >>>>
> >>>> You still haven't shown how one can be addicted to illegal
> >>>> drugs without possessing those drugs.
> >>>>
> >>> Yes I did. I explained how Limbaugh was addicted to drugs when he
> >>> was getting treatment and had no access to illegal drugs at that
> >>> time.
> >>
> >> You once again evaded the issue of how he got the illegal
> >> drugs he became addicted to.
> >>
> > I didn't think that was a valid issue.
>
> Your evasion and acquiessance of the point is noted.
>
It's not a valid point. Being addicted to drugs isn't illegal. That
is what I said and you insisted otherwise claiming that being
addicted to drugs was illegal because the person couldn't become
addicted to drugs without access *at some time* to illegal drugs.
You were wrong in that that doesn't make being addicted to drugs
illegal.


> >
> >
> >>> Being addicted to drugs isn't a crime.
> >>
> >> Tell us again how one can be addicted to illegal drugs without
> >> possessing them.
> >>
> > I did tell you. The issue here is essentially one of aspect and
> > perhaps tense:
>
> No, it's a matter of law.
>
It could be a matter of law but what we were talking about was
aspect.



> Now tell us again how one can be addicted to illegal drugs without
> possessing those illegal drugs.
>
You could've become addicted when you had the drugs and still be
addicted after you didn't have them anymore.


> Or just admint that you're a stammering ignoramus and move on.
>
No.



--
"Oh, I'm broke."
"Take another mortgage, don't give in."
"I thought you were broke. Where did you get all that money from?"
"Don't question me."
"Where did you get it?"
"I borrowed it from the bank."
"Well, you can't do that, that's cheating."
"Listen you little stoat, I own Park Lane, I can borrow as much
bloody money as I like."
~Joanna Lumley and Julia Sawalha, "Absolutely Fabulous"

[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]

Antworten