Re: why is deleuze so much more interesting than woody allen?
Von: sirblob2@hotmail.com [Profil]
Datum: 17.08.2008 06:16
Message-ID: <345edea1-56f3-453f-8e03-c928b7e5290e@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.debate alt.philosophy alt.literaturerec.arts.movies.current-films rec.arts.movies.past-films
Datum: 17.08.2008 06:16
Message-ID: <345edea1-56f3-453f-8e03-c928b7e5290e@k37g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.philosophy.debate alt.philosophy alt.literaturerec.arts.movies.current-films rec.arts.movies.past-films
On 17 ago, 05:37, calvin <cri...@windstream.net> wrote: > On Aug 16, 9:46 pm, Derek Janssen <ejan...@nospam.verizon.net> wrote: > > > sirbl...@hotmail.com wrote: > > > well? > > > Oh, well as can be; the summer weather's been good, and I've been > > exercising, allergies haven't been acting up-- > > Always say, if you haven't got your health... :) > > Health is okay, but it's better to look good than to feel good. that's neither spinoza nor deleuze so it's gotta be allen.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Derek Janssen (17.08.2008 06:24)
- MFalc1 (17.08.2008 23:37)
