Re: Historical Preservation(McMansion branch off)
Von: Rotten (bdjr76@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 05.10.2007 05:39
Message-ID: <scmdnU8qC4J-LJjanZ2dnUVZ_oGjnZ2d@comcast.com>
Newsgroup: alt.planning.urban
Datum: 05.10.2007 05:39
Message-ID: <scmdnU8qC4J-LJjanZ2dnUVZ_oGjnZ2d@comcast.com>
Newsgroup: alt.planning.urban
"William" <willbecool10@gmail.com> wrote in message news:1191288909.680749.192440@r29g2000hsg.googlegroups.com... > On Oct 1, 6:35 am, "george conklin" <nos...@nospam.com> wrote: >> "Jack May" <jack....@comcast.net> wrote in message >> >> news:TMadnWv39Yo25Z3anZ2dnUVZ_hGdnZ2d@comcast.com... >> >> >> >> > Few people can live in the large number of old Victorian houses in SF, >> > so >> > most of them are totally gutted inside and rebuilt so that people can >> > live >> > in them. >> >> > The Victorians were not good architects and like most old houses those >> > houses were probably not well built. They certainly don't have >> > adequate >> > utilities usually don't even have a garage or much of a back yard. >> >> The goal is to preserve old upper class housing. What the workers >> lived >> in is best forgotten. > > Urbanism is an upper class issue anyway. > > Haha, tell that to inner city crime and poverty rates... How would you tell it to inner city crime and poverty rates?[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]