• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: A Different View of Global Warming

"Kurt Lochner" <kurt_lochner@NOSPAMhotmail.com> wrote in message
news:46F6917C.12071BF4@NOSPAMhotmail.com...
> Robert Miller writhed in denials when:
>>
>> Kurt Lochner noted the dishonest insinuendos from:
>> >
>> >Robert Miller knee-jerked reflexively when:
>> > >
>> > > Kurt Lochner was heckling the ambitious ignorance of:
>> > > >
>> > > >leotard78sp@gmail.com AKA lost_ass@yahoo.com writhed in denials:
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > >So far neither IPCC nor anyone else has provided
>> > > > >one iota of valid data for global warming[..]
>> > > >
>> > > > In your opinion, that is..
>> > > >
>> > > > --Would you care to discuss that "issue"?
>> > >
>> > >Is Commerce and Industry responsible [..]
>> >
>> > Are you trying to insinuate something that you cannot
>> > actually prove directly?
>>
>>Insinuate? what would I be insinuating?
>
> That the following pseudo-science has any bearing on the discussion
> of man-made global warming, and the factual conclusions regarding that..
>
Socalled Pseudo-science once said the earth was a Globe, that the earth
was a planet that revolved around the sun.  Mainstream science phrenology
once told us you could determine a person intelligence or personality by the
bumps on their head.  Some scientists still believe this to be true.  I
recently
read that a NASA scientist in the 70's was predicting Global Cooling, now
he's warning us of Global Warming.

>>It has been observed that Mars is experiencing a global warming[..]
>
> And if anything else could be concluded from that, it would be
> that the adding more CO2 in our own atmosphere might not be a
> wise thing to do..

What nobody knows is how much effect  the CO2 is having, but many claim
to be absolutely sure we are bringing crisis on ourselves.  I personally
know
one scientist that say di-hydrogen oxide has several orders of magnitude
greater
effect on global warming than CO2, but nobody worries about water vapor
>
>>As has happened time and again in the past when there was no
>>industry or commerce on the planet.
>
> You apparently would like to ignore the facts that do not
> suit your beliefs, and that disqualifies you as an objective
> observer, something you learn how to do when you study science..
>
> Example follows..
>
>> > --And are you still trying to control two LNB's with a LO?
>>
>>My original interest in getting a degree in electronics was to
>>become an amature radio astronomer,
>
> That would be a noble calling, however, I don't think you have
> what it takes to complete that adventure.
>
I don't know how noble it is, it may already have been done.  Certainly for
analog signals it's very easy.  For digital signals I need a power supply
that
supplies both 13 and 18 volts and a transistor circuit to supply the
voltages
to both LNB's.  The problem is certainly not trivial, but likely a more
effective
method would be to use a larger dish and a single LNB.  Since angular
resolution of the digital signal would do virtually nothing.  The much
larger dish
I already have.

>>so I am familiar with radio interferometry.
>
> I doubt it entirely, and I'm speaking from 20+ years of
> experience with satellite telecommunications..
>
>>Using to dishes to collect the same signal.
>
> Digital or analog?  In either case, using a "DirectTV" dish
> isn't the way to go, as there's very little gain to be had
> in comparison to 12' to 30' dish antenna..
>
Since I am a technician working for Directv and was looking to diminish rain
fade
near zero their dish/LNB would be the ideal.  I have a 2 meter dish already.

>>With digital communications it is more difficult.
>
> Especially using a smaller dish with maybe 12dBi gain..
>
>>I will have to design the circuit myself to split signal
>>from the directv receiver to the LNB's.
>
> That's actually funny, since many of the recent "direct"
> satellite receivers already have two LNB inputs..
>
Yes but they don't look at the same satalite at the same time do they.

>>Just to satisfy my own curiosity.
>
> Whatever floats your boat, I just doubt that you have
> anything but a faint comprehension of what your proposing.
>
That's why people ask questions of people more knowledgeable than
themselves.
You know you are only two steps behind me.  It's not hard to design a
circuit if
you understand exactly what you hope to accomplish, and what you have or
need
to accomplish it with.

Even global warming might have a short-term technical fix provided the will
and
desire.  Short-term could be tens to hundreds of year by blocking sunlight
via arrays
of solar voltaic arrays in orbit to block a percentage of sunlight from ever
striking the
earth, and providing solar power at the same time.

One way or the other man will survive global warming even if Miami, New
Orleans and
Venice do not.  Man will also survive the next Ice Age whenever that is no
matter what
the future doomsayers say.

>>So you can google [..]
>
> I just wanted to see if you had even a clue, which you don't..
>
> --But thanks for playing..

I'm sure all who believe as you are considered wise and knowledgeable.  Be
wary of of people who put to much faith in their own knowledge or opinions.
They become incompetent in determining their own level of competece.

Too many people believe competence in one field equates to competent in
other
fields.  That's why I enjoy the company of individuals much smarter than I
in many
fields, and I ask many questions on subjects I'm interested in.

Antworten