• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: Illiberal liberalism

"Rev. Bob 'Bob' Crispen" <revbob@the.rectory> wrote in message
news:Xns99AD9E823E638revbob@140.99.99.130...
> The kindly Rev. overheard metaluna <no@email.no> saying on Tue 04
> Sep 2007 05:09:19p:
>
>>>>>>>> MLK will never be spokesman for morality. He was a sex
pig.
>>>>>>> What does sex have to do with morality?
>>>>>> xxxx
>>>>>> Best explained by writing Ted Kennedy, Bill Clinton, Jesse
>>>>>> Jackson, Sen. Craig....
>>>>> Yet more validation that, to a Real Right-Winger, Sex Conquers
>>>>> All.
>>>>>
>>>>> Well, so long as you can come up with *some* excuse to let you
>>>>> keep that hate burning (and never, never look at the real
>>>>> reason you hate those people (with the exception of the one you
>>>>> tacked on at the very end)), you're good to go in the local
>>>>> Ditto Room. >>> The hypocrisy evident in this unwarranted
>>>>> attack is classic
>>>> projection.
>>>
>>> You haven't had much exposure to Smith29, have you?
>>>
>> I am referring to this purported Reverend's erratic behavior.
>
> Sorry, Bubba, the question here isn't about supposeldoly "eratic"
> behavior, it's about your suppport for for Republican Party's program
> of racism.
>
How much support did the Civil Rights Act get from Democrats compared
to Republicans?  The problem as I see it is that the Republicans are much
less
socialistic/communistic than the Democrats.  In what nation did the
socialist /
communists parties care more about social justice than they did for the
party
members?


> Try to keep up, won't you?
> --
> Rev. Bob "Bob" Crispen
> revbob at crispen dot org
> Ex Cathedra weblog: http://blog.crispen.org/
>
> That which does not kill us has made its last mistake.

Antworten