Re: A Different View of Global Warming
Von: Robert Miller (rober999@windstream.net) [Profil]
Datum: 25.09.2007 00:40
Message-ID: <d3fa$46f83cfd$471f667b$7620@ALLTEL.NET>
Newsgroup: alt.politicstalk.politics.misc alt.global-warmingtalk.environment sci.environment
Datum: 25.09.2007 00:40
Message-ID: <d3fa$46f83cfd$471f667b$7620@ALLTEL.NET>
Newsgroup: alt.politicstalk.politics.misc alt.global-warmingtalk.environment sci.environment
"HangEveryRepubliKKKan" <Justice@ExecuteTheBushTraitor.com> wrote in message news:e1HJi.4163$tx1.651@read1.cgocable.net... > > "Robert Miller" <rober999@windstream.net> wrote >> Socalled Pseudo-science once said the earth was a Globe, that the earth >> was a planet that revolved around the sun. Mainstream science phrenology >> once told us you could determine a person intelligence or personality by >> the >> bumps on their head. Some scientists still believe this to be true. I >> recently read that a NASA scientist in the 70's was predicting Global >> Cooling, now >> he's warning us of Global Warming. > > And physicians used to bleed people with leaches and thought bad smells > produced disease. > > Times change, knowledge increases and science advances, and the Globe > continues to warm. > > If the globe continues to warm because of normal and natural causes, what are you going to do or say about it? > "Robert Miller" <rober999@windstream.net> wrote >> What nobody knows is how much effect the CO2 is having, but many claim >> to be absolutely sure we are bringing crisis on ourselves. > > It's obvious we are if you know anything about science. > You don't. That's why you couldn't make it as an astronomer. > I didn't want to be an astronomer. I still enjoy astronomy either with a rather nice telescope, or reading books from the astronomy book club or online. But you assume to much about someone you know nothing about. > > "Robert Miller" <rober999@windstream.net> wrote >> I personally know one scientist that say di-hydrogen oxide has several >> orders of magnitude greater effect on global warming than CO2, but nobody >> worries about water vapor > > Every scientist claims that water vapour is the principle greenhouse gas. > But since it's concentration is set by temperature and is readily rained > out of the air, it isn't in the drivers seat. The other greenhouse gasses > that have orders of magnitude longer lifetimes are the driving factor of > this current temperature change. > > It's obvious we are if you know anything about science. > I know that people for political reasons make scientific claims which eventually get debunked. Generally by people who do not have the wit or the time to check their facts. Or in many cases don't care about the facts. Like the other planets rising global temperatures. If you present them with scientific facts on this subject they will reject and keep the same dogma as before. As in the visual evidence that Jupiter is warming as well as Mars. Not to mention other heavenly bodies as well. Earths climate heats and cools. However there is a more pressing problem that you can't blame on man. The earth's magnetic field is weakening. It has been 5,000 years since the Earth's magnetic field reversed. More than double the previous 2 times it reversed itself. If the magnetic field goes to zero gauss cosmic radiation will strike the surface and nobody knows how long that condition will last before the magnetic field regains its strength. Crops may be lost, animals my die off all around the planet, the seas could be similarly effected. Millions or billions of people may die of cancer or starvation. A much more serious problem than climate change that would be better for some regions, and not as good for other regions.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- HangEveryRepubliKKKan (25.09.2007 08:42)
- Robert Miller (27.09.2007 19:56)
- HangEveryRepubliKKKan (28.09.2007 21:29)
- Robert Miller (29.09.2007 20:16)
- Talk-n-Dog (30.09.2007 15:14)
- HangEveryRepubliKKKan (07.10.2007 19:13)
- HangEveryRepubliKKKan (01.10.2007 22:34)
- Robert Miller (03.10.2007 04:53)
- HangEveryRepubliKKKan (06.10.2007 20:45)
