Re: Forget the blackhole, earth is gonna explode !
Von: De Joker © (antispam@dont-even-think-of.it) [Profil]
Datum: 10.10.2008 09:38
Message-ID: <48EF067F.1D9D56B0@Dont-even-think-of.it>
Newsgroup: nl.wetenschap nl.politiek alt.sci.physics alt.politics alt.astronomy
Datum: 10.10.2008 09:38
Message-ID: <48EF067F.1D9D56B0@Dont-even-think-of.it>
Newsgroup: nl.wetenschap nl.politiek alt.sci.physics alt.politics alt.astronomy
BradGuth wrote: > On Oct 9, 2:09 pm, De Joker © <antis...@Dont-even-think-of.it> wrote: >> Kristoff Bonne wrote: >> > BradGuth schreef: >> .. >> ... >> >> Colliding large numbers of protons at nearly 2c is not exactly >> >> failsafe, nor otherwise affordable. >> >> > I always like it when somebody repeats the same arguments as before in >> > an discussion. It's the best way to see you have won the discussion. :-) >> >> > Keep on repeating it ... "1 + 1 = 2" ... "1 + 1 = 2" ... "1 + 1 = 2" ... >> > "1 + 1 = 2" ... "1 + 1 = 2" .... >> >> > Who knows. If you repeat it enough ... perhaps in the end, some magic >> > will appear and all school text-books will all change themselfs by >> > themselfs and rewrite the very first page of the theory of relativity". >> >> > "Experiments have shown that the speed of light is the same in any >> > direction", but it isn't "logical" for people, >> >> Also, the statement was not about the speed of light. It just seems to >> mention the speed difference of the two colliding protons (which is >> 2c, as you know). Confusing this speed difference with the speed >> of one proton observed by the other is an often made error, but it's >> not clear whether Brad was actually making it here.. (are you?) > > I was being 100% perfectly clear. Yes, but Brad, in this particular case, being 200% clear would have been more, ehh.. appropriate! (J)[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]