nntp2http.com
Posting
Suche
Optionen
Hilfe & Kontakt

Re: Palin Flunks History On Pledge Of Allegiance

Von: leonard78sp@gmail.com (leonard78sp@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 03.09.2008 18:57
Message-ID: <01ac0d0e-5caa-4341-9a72-c35eddb3e504@m44g2000hsc.googlegroups.com>
Followup-to: alt.politics.usa.republican, alt.politics.democrats.d, talk.politics.misc, alt.fan.rush-limbaugh, alt.politics.bush
Newsgroup: alt.politics.bush alt.fan.rush-limbaughtalk.politics.misc alt.politics.democrats.d alt.politics.usa.republican
On Sep 3, 12:30 pm, "OneTwoThree" <you...@notverysmart.ru> wrote:
> "RichTravesy" <traRvE...@hotmMOVEail.com> wrote in message
> news:48BEAEE9.F6DDEA0D@hotmMOVEail.com...
.
> > The bloggers have found a 2006 policy questionnaire in which Palin was
> > asked
> > whether she was offended by the phrase "under God" in the Pledge of
> > Allegiance.
>
> > Palin answered: "Not on your life. If it was good enough for the Foundi
ng
> > Fathers,
> > it's good enough for me."
>
> > The pledge was created in the late 1800s and did not become official un
til
> > 1942,
> > and the words "under God" were not inserted until 1954.
> > ...
>
> > Sheesh.
>
> not everyone knows everything,.
inconsequential
>  like you do.
> > RT


[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]