Re: Alternatives to the Bailout Swindle
Von: *Anarcissie* (anarcissie@gmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 09.10.2008 15:36
Message-ID: <5072d312-46d2-40fc-8480-bf5aee5bf9ba@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.anarchism alt.society.liberalismtalk.politics.libertarian alt.politics.economicssci.econ
Datum: 09.10.2008 15:36
Message-ID: <5072d312-46d2-40fc-8480-bf5aee5bf9ba@g17g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.anarchism alt.society.liberalismtalk.politics.libertarian alt.politics.economicssci.econ
On Oct 8, 10:45 pm, Dan Clore <cl...@columbia-center.org> wrote: > retrogro...@comcast.net wrote: > > On Tue, 7 Oct 2008 10:45:23 -0700 (PDT), "*Anarcissie*" > > <anarcis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >>> Seriously though please pint to an successful anarchistic state. > >>> Or libertarian state. > >> That is not really a valid argument against the possibility of > >> anarchistic or libertarian polities. > > > To lots of us it is. If there is a superior way of doing things that > > people have been talking about for centuries, then it's almost > > certainly been tried. So where are the successful examples? > > Point to an attempt to form an anarchist / libertarian society (surely > you do not mean "state"?) that has not been massively outmanned and > outgunned by states attempting to conquer them. > ... That might comprise both retrogrouch's point and mine. Mine is that the state is the form of society best suited for war, and his is that it is the form of society best suited for survival (of the form, not necessarily of its inmates, and not necessarily in the future as in the past). There is no contradiction there.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Dan Clore (09.10.2008 18:14)
