President Obama (for record only)
Von: Mason C (masoncxxx@xxxfrontal-lobe.info) [Profil]
Datum: 04.11.2009 21:04
Message-ID: <aum3f5517a16a9aoo9lm60ffi26n2qbdvr@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.republican alt.politics.liberalism alt.politics.economics alt.politics.conservative alt.politics
Datum: 04.11.2009 21:04
Message-ID: <aum3f5517a16a9aoo9lm60ffi26n2qbdvr@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.republican alt.politics.liberalism alt.politics.economics alt.politics.conservative alt.politics
A note regarding President Obama (original October 30, 2009)
A recent e-mail distribution of a scurrilous election screed attacking
Barack Obama has induced me to record my impressions of the
presidency of Obama. I am doing this on October 30, before
announcement of his crucial Afghanistan decision. And before a
well-defined health-care reform bill is known.
Health reform
Many are paying for the health care of those millions without
insurance who come to emergency wards with aggravated illness. Many
are denied insurance because of existing afflictions or have their
insurance cancelled because of existing afflictions.
Reform of the American health-care system is necessary. Previous
attempts have failed, primarily because of the lobbying and advertising
of the insurance industry.
The Republicans have fought on the side of that insurance industry.
This is emphasized by the publicity drawn by the only one or two
Republicans who might vote with the Democrats for reform. Obama's
desire for reform may be frustrated by the Republican control of the
Senate -- by virtue of the Senate rule requiring 60 votes.
The Senate should force the Republicans to actually filibuster -- make
endless speeches on the floor of the Senate to block passage of reform.
The 60 vote rule is not understood by good citizens who wrongly think
the Democrats have control of the Senate.
Economy
The economy crashed because of years of deregulation under Carter,
Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and Bush -- but primarily following the
"government is the problem" philosophy of Reagan.
The repeal of Glass-Steagal permitted the banks to speculate. The
refusal of the Federal Reserve and the Treasury to regulate derivatives
despite warnings from both within and outside government left the
speculators on Wall Street to create a financial asset bubble.
The bubble consisted of derivatives -- especially securities claiming
to have value based on paper collateral such as home mortgages.
The true value of these derivatives was not known. The market prices
were greatly inflated.
The bubble broke as all bubbles do. The Bush Treasury under the
Wall Streeter, Paulson, created an emergency fund of $700 billion to
relieve the banks and Wall Street firms of these "toxic assets." This
TARP -- Toxic Asset Relief Program (Public Law 110-343)-- was than
used instead to bail out those banks and Wall Street firms. The toxic
assets were allowed to remain on their books, priced as they wished --
marking them to the market was not required and not possible because
that market price was either not known or so low as to put the banks
and firms into bankruptcy.
The true state of the largest banks is not publicly known at this date.
Under Obama, a stimulus package of spending -- about $787 billion
-- was started to increase the aggregate demand -- the total of private
and government purchasing. This was needed because the private buying had
sharply dropped. Without demand -- spending -- businesses could not
continue to employ workers, unemployment rose, consumer confidence
dropped, and buying fell below production. This creates a vicious cycle
that may lead to a great depression.
The huge deficit spending under Reagan and the two Bushes --
creating debt with the avowed intent of forcing the shrinking of
government -- was followed by the two huge spendings of the Bush
TARP and the Obama Stimulus. Republicans, both for political purposes
and because of their ignorance of government finance, have screamed and
shouted about the debt. Their most glaring stupidity is their science-
fantasy belief in time travel. They claim that our grandchildren will
be forced to send money back in time to pay the debt. Of course, our
grandchildren will be able to consume what they produce unless they
ship their canned beans and autos back to us ("beam me up, Scotty".
What we send to them will be an infrastructure (safe bridges, education,
energy resources etc.) which can indeed be sent forward in time.
The best instruction regarding the Debt is the history of the debt of
World War 2 which was larger than the current debt, ended the Great
Depression, and gave the "greatest generation" a golden era from 1946
until 1970.
Wars
Before the attack of September 11, 2001, George W. Bush was
determined to be a "war president" and to accomplish what his father
had not done: occupy Iraq and remove Sadam Hussein. It was a
son-and-father rivalry. The attack of 9-11 provided the setting. Bush
invaded first Afghanistan, then Iraq -- leaving Afghanistan to the
Taliban with Osama bin Laden in hiding.
A democratic and stable Iraq will be a new gem in the Middle East
-- if it happens. Iraq may yet fall into civil war, this remains to be
seen. The United States has expended more than 4,000 lives and about
one trillion dollars on this invasion. The Iraqis lost 100,000 civilian
lives, two million refugees -- mostly their most competent citizens, and
great damage to their infrastructure. The brutal Saddam Hussein was
captured and hanged. The United States provided great recruiting aid for
the terrorists by its use of torture of Muslims.
Afghanistan:
Alexander the Great had the wisdom to pass through quickly and
never return. Akbar Khan killed Sir William Hay Macnaghten with his
own hands whereupon 4,500 British troops and 12,000 civilians marched
out of Kabul but only *one* survived.
Kipling's "The "Man Who Would Be King" ventured into
Afghanistan, and returned only as a withered head in a bag. Rudyard
Kipling wrote this metaphor to teach the armies who would be King in
Afghanistan. But armies do not learn.
The English created the Durand Line -- the hiding place of Osama bin
Laden -- defining the border between Afghanistan and India -- and ended
all attempts to control Afghanistan.
The Russian invasion of Afghanistan, 1979-89, was a major factor in
the fall of the Soviet Union.
Afghanistan is a geographic area occupied by many tribes. It is not
a nation to be conquered or built. It is a burial place for invaders
and would-be do-gooders.
Obama's accomplishments.
They are considerable, many by executive orders changing the
domestic policies of Bush, and by new attitudes in the executive
departments. A recital here would only be to incite the lying,
screaming, and shouting of Republicans whose only goal is the
destruction of Obama regardless of the damage to they cause to
America.
Will the Obama Presidency be a failure?
Probably.
There are too many problems left by his predecessors, both Democrats
and Republicans, and the course of history. With the potential of being
one of the smartest and most accomplished presidents in United States
history, Obama may fail.
The economy may slide into Great Depression 2. Regardless of the
fact that the crash was permitted by the removal of regulation beginning
with President Carter but primarily by Republican impulses, Obama will
be blamed for either failing to provide enough stimulus or for spending
too much.
Iraq may fall into civil war. Obama will be blamed for withdrawing
even though withdrawal was set by Bush. And Bush had abandoned
Afghanistan.
Afghanistan cannot be built as a nation. Obama will be blamed for
the failure to send enough troops. Or for not pulling out sooner.
Either way, he cannot win. Afghanistan can only be abandoned again
to settle its own affairs, as was Vietnam. Obama, like Lyndon B.
Johnson, may be the victim of hubris the belief in America's invincible
power.
Finally, the attacks on him by the money-making radio and
television right wing shouters and screamers-- the leaders of the
Republican party -- will bear fruit. It is inevitable that their
continuing attacks will incite at least an assassination attempt.
They will not be charged, as they should be, with inciting an
attempted murder.
And that's the news for October 30, 2009.
P.S. I apologize for this repeat, but the original seems to have
disappeared from Usenet. This article is only "for the record" so
that I can some day say, "I told you so."
Mason Clark http://frontal-lobe.info
book: Greater America in the Age of Rebellion
book: The Healing Wisdom of Dr.P.P.Quimby
book: Get Rich in Small Business (html)
book: Homosexuality: Causes and Cures
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]Antworten
- Morton Davis (10.11.2009 01:21)
- Michael Coburn (10.11.2009 04:49)
