Which Among You Dupes Thought GM and Chrysler Would -- Or Could -- Pay Back Your Tax Dollars?
Von: God'sLittleAnus (perryneheum@hotmail.com) [Profil]
Datum: 03.11.2009 22:49
Message-ID: <949e3ae0-5f8d-41ed-b801-f883e297a9ab@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.bush alt.impeach.bush alt.politics.economics alt.autos.chrysler.sebring alt.autos.gm
Datum: 03.11.2009 22:49
Message-ID: <949e3ae0-5f8d-41ed-b801-f883e297a9ab@j9g2000vbp.googlegroups.com>
Newsgroup: alt.politics.bush alt.impeach.bush alt.politics.economics alt.autos.chrysler.sebring alt.autos.gm
Digest The Washington Post Tuesday, November 3, 2009 AUTOMOTIVE "U.S. investment likely lost, GAO says" TAXPAYERS are unlikely to recover their full investment in General Motors or Chrysler, U.S. government investigators said Monday in the latest review to cast doubts that the government will recoup the $80 billion it poured into the two automakers. The Government Accountability Office concluded that General Motors and Chrysler likely will not be valuable enough for the Treasury Department to break even on its investment in the two auto companies that went through bankruptcy earlier this year. The GAO also revealed that the Obama administration is closely scrutinizing the finances of GM and Chrysler and has set some requirements on production even though it has said it will maintain a hands-off approach on the automakers' daily operations. To recover the loans Treasury gave Chrysler and GM to keep them afloat, the automakers would have to reach valuations they did not approach even when they were healthier. GM spokesman Greg Martin said "if we get our job done, the government has an excellent chance of getting a return on its investment." Chrysler declined to comment. -- Associated Press http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/02/AR2009110203479.html[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- alt.politics.bush (03.11.2009 23:15)
- John Galt (03.11.2009 23:16)
- Mike Hunter (04.11.2009 18:49)
- John Galt (04.11.2009 17:55)
- Lamont Cranston (04.11.2009 19:22)
- John Galt (04.11.2009 19:24)
- Day (08.11.2009 00:25)
- Beam Me Up Scotty (04.11.2009 19:26)
- Lamont Cranston (04.11.2009 21:40)
- dr_jeff (05.11.2009 01:53)
- Jeff Strickland (05.11.2009 02:03)
- dr_jeff (05.11.2009 02:07)
- dr_jeff (05.11.2009 02:08)
- Roy Blankenship (05.11.2009 02:28)
- Jeff Strickland (05.11.2009 02:39)
- Roy Blankenship (05.11.2009 05:47)
- Jeff Strickland (05.11.2009 17:14)
- Lamont Cranston (09.11.2009 18:22)
- John Galt (05.11.2009 05:25)
- alt.politics.bush (11.11.2009 16:20)
- Canuck57 (04.11.2009 01:56)
- Roy Blankenship (04.11.2009 22:25)
- Canuck57 (07.11.2009 01:12)
- Lamont Cranston (09.11.2009 18:20)
- Canuck57 (13.11.2009 05:53)
- jose el fontanero (05.11.2009 00:33)
- jose (03.11.2009 23:25)
- Canuck57 (04.11.2009 01:54)
