• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Robert Lithgow QC on my non-admission as a barrister and solicitor

I happened to hear Mr. Lithgow making comments on Nine-to-Noon (Radio New
Zealand National) today (3.9.2008) which appeared to be about my
well-publicised non-receipt of a Certificate from the Wellington District
Law Society, and I would like to make the following comments:

1. I was suprised to hear him say that the District Law Society had merely
"delayed" agreeing to give me a certificate, because the closest they
actually came to saying that to me was that they said that they were
unwilling to issue me with a certificate "at this time" -- which is far from
an explicit statement that they were merely delaying issuing me with a
certificate.  If the District Law Society has informed third parties -- but
not me -- that what they intended was merely to delay issuing a certificate,
then I consider that their behaviour is in that respect improper, and
lacking in the appropriate transparency and regard for natural justice in
respect of myself, in view of the public role that they perform and the
power that they have over myself.

2. Mr. Lithgow also stated that I had been rude to two judges.  That is not
correct, as far as I am aware.  I scrupulously avoid (not that it is
something that I have occasion to contemplate in the first place) being rude
to currently serving judges -- though I would retaliate in kind to rudeness
if it occurred in a social context, possibly.   I did deliberately publish
on the Web a constitutionally imperative rude rebuke to then
Governor-General Cartwright, but she was not a judge at that time.  I also
distributed material which was highly critical of an untruth perpetrated by
Judge Margaret Lee, when she was a Law Commissioner.  In neither of those
cases were the objects of my attacks serving as judges.  I have documentary
evidence that judges regard each other as judges even when they have stopped
serving as judges, and that is understandable on one level.
Constitutionally, however, I maintain that a judge does not have the right
to carry with them the deference that they used to deserve as a judge when
they cease to serve as judges.

Peter Zohrab
--
Fathers' Coalition http://a-fathers-coalition.blogspot.com:80/ Domestic
Violence, Predetermination & the Feminised Bureaucracy
http://equality.netfirms.com/femiburo.html Judge questions abortion legality
www.odt.co.nz/news/national/9115/judge-questions-legality-abortions Bull
Buster http://antimisandry.com/vbdr/bullbusters Income-Splitting
www.parentschoice08.blogspot.com/ Paternity Orders and Parentage Tests Bill
www.unitedfuture.org.nz/assets/sm/444/46/FamilyProceedingsPaternityOrdersandParentageTests
AmendmentBill1.pdf

Antworten