Re: Thoughts?
Von: What Me Worry? (__@____.___) [Profil]
Datum: 07.07.2008 05:59
Message-ID: <naKdnRO2AN4aCezVnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@comcast.com>
Newsgroup: alt.politics alt.politics.economics alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.liberalismtalk.politics.misc
Datum: 07.07.2008 05:59
Message-ID: <naKdnRO2AN4aCezVnZ2dnUVZ_q_inZ2d@comcast.com>
Newsgroup: alt.politics alt.politics.economics alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.liberalismtalk.politics.misc
"David Hartung" <d_hartung@comcast.net> wrote in message news:vNCdnbvnmqlcDOzVnZ2dnUVZ_qXinZ2d@comcast.com... > http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0708/11553.html > > If he can do it, he just might avert the train wreck that is coming. > > Right now, I am 12 years away from full Social Security. Last time I checked, I believe SS was okay until 2050. That has likely changed due to recent economic disasters. > There is no way that the government can pay full benefits to those who > will be retiring in the next 20 or so years. Something will have to be > done. Correct. > I propose that beginning immediately, anyone under 60, must wait until 68 > to collect partial benefits, and 70 for full benefits. That sound reasonable, if it will save the system. > This may not be enough, we may have to push it back to 72 for partial, and > 75 for full. Push it back until it models the retirement age vs life expectancy when the program was started. > Before anyone brings it up, this is not a Republican problem. Every > president since Eisenhower had a hand in the creation of the problem. Yes.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- Bill Bonde (07.07.2008 07:02)
- OneTwoThree (07.07.2008 10:03)
- Bill Bonde (07.07.2008 18:32)
- David Hartung (07.07.2008 18:38)
- Mitchell Holman (08.07.2008 00:29)
- OneTwoThree (08.07.2008 08:20)
- Bill Bonde (08.07.2008 01:26)
- Matt (08.07.2008 04:08)
- David Hartung (08.07.2008 05:37)
- OneTwoThree (08.07.2008 08:21)
- Poster (07.07.2008 18:47)
