• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Simon Sheppard and Steve Whittle seek asylum in the US from British totalitarianism.

http://www.davidduke.com/general/simon-sheppard-steve-whittle-seek-asylum-o
ver-thought-offense-charges_4209.html

Breaking News From Freedom’s Front Line

From JailingOpinions.com

Two British citizens, Simon Sheppard and Steve Whittle, have sought
political asylum in the United States after being convicted under
Britain’s notoriously repressive race laws. Their case made legal
history because they were convicted in connection with a website which
is based in the United States, where its contents are legal.

The website concerned publishes articles satirising many aspects of
modern liberal politics. Readers may disagree with much of the site’s
content, but the criminalisation of Messrs Sheppard and Whittle is an
especially worrying extension of the continent-wide attack on European
freedom.

Until recently it had been thought that authors and publishers had
some degree of legal protection if their work appeared on websites
hosted on U.S. servers. The Sheppard and Whittle case shows that
British courts are now claiming that their jurisdiction extends across
the Atlantic.

The U.K. currently has no law specifically prohibiting Holocaust
revisionism, but the Sheppard and Whittle case implies that the
existing laws against “racial hatred” will be reinterpreted to
criminalise some forms of revisionism.

Simon Sheppard and Steve Whittle have chosen to publicise this attack
on freedom by flying to California and claiming political asylum. This
bold course of action has seriously embarrassed the British
authorities, and puts the spotlight on the contrast between the First
Amendment protections enjoyed by Americans and the increasingly severe
crackdown on political dissent across Europe.

These embattled Britons need your help to pay the inevitable legal
bills engendered by their brave stand. An appeal has been organised by
Mr Paul Ballard, a well known British political activist.

Paul is a man of great personal integrity, and a friend of Simon’s, so
well qualified to take on this task.

Not a penny of this money will go to the Heretical Two’s English
solicitors or counsel, who are being paid out of the legal aid fund,
and are neither permitted nor willing to accept a penny piece from
well wishers.

The Jailing Opinions website has no financial connection with this
appeal nor with any aspect of the case, but is happy to advertise the
appeal address for those who wish to contribute.

Cheques should be made out to ‘The Croydon Preservation Society’ and
posted to P.O. Box 301, Carshalton, Surrey, SM5 4QW.

Alternatively donations can be wired to the following account via
Paypal, Western Union etc.:

Croydon Preservation Society, Lloyds TSB Bank plc, 49 / 53 High
Street, Sutton, Surrey SM1 1DT

sort code 77-30-03

account no. 86187860

Donations can also be paid in to this account at any branch of Lloyds
TSB.

[You can send Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle letters of support
care of the Santa Anna Jail P.O. Box 22003 Santa Anna, CA. 92701]








The case of the Heretical Two is discussed in the context of other
recent European legal cases in a series of three radio broadcasts by
Lady Renouf and Dr David Duke which can be heard in MP3 format:

1st August broadcast

4th August broadcast

8th August broadcast

While Simon Sheppard, Steve Whittle and others are given prison
sentences for “inciting hatred”, an extreme genocidal form of hatred
is actively promoted by the mainstream media. Soon after Sheppard and
Whittle’s arrival in the U.S. the Israeli historian Prof. Benny Morris
used the columns of the New York Times to call for the bombing (and
even potentially nuclear bombing) of Iran.

Morris’s fellow Jewish academic James Petras provided an insightful
commentary on his website:

On July 18, 2008 The New York Times published an article by Israeli-
Jewish historian, Professor Benny Morris, advocating an Israeli
nuclear-genocidal attack on Iran with the likelihood of killing 70
million Iranians – 12 times the number of Jewish victims in the Nazi
holocaust.

…“Iran’s leaders would do well to rethink their gamble and suspend
their nuclear program. Barring this, the best they could hope for is
that Israel’s conventional air assault will destroy their nuclear
facilities. To be sure, this would mean thousands of Iranian
casualties and international humiliation. But the alternative is an
Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland.”

Morris is a frequent lecturer and consultant to the Israeli political
and military establishment and has unique access to Israeli strategic
military planners. Morris’ advocacy and public support of the massive,
brutal expulsion of all Palestinians is on public record. Yet his
genocidal views have not precluded his receiving numerous academic
awards. His writings and views are published in Israel’s leading
newspapers and journals. Morris’ views are not the idle ranting of a
marginal psychopath, as witnessed by the recent publication of his
latest op-ed article in the New York Times.

What does the publication by the New York Times of an article, which
calls for the nuclear incineration of 70 million Iranians and the
contamination of the better part of a billion people in the Middle
East, Asia and Europe, tell us about US politics and culture? For it
is the NYT, which informs the ‘educated classes’ in the US, its Sunday
supplements, literary and editorial pages and which serves as the
‘moral conscience’ of important sectors of the cultural, economic and
political elite.

…Truth to say, this is the logical outgrowth of the Times public
endorsement of Israel’s economic blockade to starve 1.4 million
Palestinians in Gaza; the Times’ cover-up of Israeli-Zionist-AIPAC
influence in launching the US invasion of Iraq leading to over one
million murdered Iraqi citizens.

The Times sets the tone for the entire New York cultural scene, which
privileges Israeli interests, to the point of assimilating into the US
political discourse not only its routine violations of international
law, but its threats, indeed promises, to scorch vast areas of the
earth in pursuit of its regional supremacy. The willingness of the NYT
to publish an Israeli genocide-ethnocide advocate tells us about the
strength of the ties between a purportedly ‘liberal establishment’ pro-
Israel publication and the totalitarian Israeli right: It is as if to
say that for the liberal pro-Israel establishment, the nonJewish Nazis
are off limits, but the views and policies of Judeo-fascists need
careful consideration and possible implementation.

…The question of Zionist power in America is not merely a question of
a ‘lobby’ influencing Congressional and White House decisions
concerning foreign aid to Israel. What is at stake today are the
related questions of the advocacy of a nuclear war in which 70 million
Iranians face extermination and the complicity of the US mass media in
providing a platform, nay a certain political respectability for mass
murder and global contamination. Unlike the Nazi past, we cannot
claim, as the good Germans did, that ‘we did not know’ or ‘we weren
’t
notified’, because it was written by an eminent Israeli academic and
was published in the New York Times.

Antworten