Re: Palins Security Clearance Credentials
Von: krp (krp2457k@verizon.net) [Profil]
Datum: 05.09.2008 11:45
Message-ID: <Mc7wk.452$Dj1.162@trnddc02>
Newsgroup: misc.legal alt.politics.republican alt.politics alt.politics.democrat alt.recovery.aa
Datum: 05.09.2008 11:45
Message-ID: <Mc7wk.452$Dj1.162@trnddc02>
Newsgroup: misc.legal alt.politics.republican alt.politics alt.politics.democrat alt.recovery.aa
"Enos Penvy" <enospenvy@ymail.com> wrote in message news:9b9a086d-3ba7-4b7b-9529-ac07033cf72d@a70g2000hsh.googlegroups.com... >> >> >> >>http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/sarah-palins-national-s... >> >> >> > From link: >> >> >> > "As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly classified >> >> > military >> >> > issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her exposure to >> >> > classified material may rival even Biden's." >> >> >> > LOL, "may rival?" Keep on spining. >> >> >> > In the meantime, some reality issues: >> >> >> > If John McCain becomes the 44th president of the United States, what >> >> > are >> >> > the odds that a blood clot or falling object will make Sarah Palin >> >> > the >> >> > 45th? >> >> >> > The actuarial tables on the Social Security Administration website >> >> > suggest that there is a better than 10% chance that McCain will die >> >> > during his first term in office. >> >> > The Reaper's scything only grows more insistent thereafter. Should >> >> > President McCain survive his first term and get elected to a second, >> >> > there is a 27% chance that Palin will become the first female U.S. >> >> > president by 2015. >> >> >> > Is Palin remotely qualified to be president of the United States? >> >> > No. >> >> >> She has far more experience in executive positions than the top of the >> >> democratic ticket. And for the most part has shown herself to be >> >> level >> >> headed and holds to the values she ran on. >> >> > Palin's values: >> >> > * Pregnant before eloping >> >> > * Married to a secessionist >> >> > * Believes that the Founding Fathers recited the Pledge of Allegiance >> >> They DID - just not the same one we have today. > > Ummmm.... > > No. They didn't. > > The Pledge of Allegiance was written in about 1892. <GROAN> Did you read what I said???? Do you understand English? The "pledge" recited at the "Continental Congress" was fundamentally DIFFERENT from that of today OR 1892. Initially it was an oath of allegiance to the CROWN. Then after 1776 they devised another, but it is not the same as what we have today. It is MANY years since I studied that to recall it exactly, but they HAD ONE.[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]