Re: Palins Security Clearance Credentials

"ScottyFLL" <ScottyFLL@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e8e4511e-4ed4-41d8-ae62-093b3513a7bd@26g2000hsk.googlegroups.com...

> >> >>
>>http://americanpowerblog.blogspot.com/2008/08/sarah-palins-national-s...
>
> >> >> > From link:
>
> >> >> > "As governor of Alaska, Palin is briefed on highly
classified
> >> >> > military
> >> >> > issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism. Her
exposure to
> >> >> > classified material may rival even Biden's."
>
> >> >> > LOL, "may rival?" Keep on spining.
>
> >> >> > In the meantime, some reality issues:
>
> >> >> > If John McCain becomes the 44th president of the United
States,
> >> >> > what
> >> >> > are
> >> >> > the odds that a blood clot or falling object will make Sarah
Palin
> >> >> > the
> >> >> > 45th?
>
> >> >> > The actuarial tables on the Social Security Administration
website
> >> >> > suggest that there is a better than 10% chance that McCain
will
> >> >> > die
> >> >> > during his first term in office.
> >> >> > The Reaper's scything only grows more insistent thereafter.
Should
> >> >> > President McCain survive his first term and get elected to a
> >> >> > second,
> >> >> > there is a 27% chance that Palin will become the first
female U.S.
> >> >> > president by 2015.
>
> >> >> > Is Palin remotely qualified to be president of the United
States?
> >> >> > No.
>
> >> >> She has far more experience in executive positions than the top
of
> >> >> the
> >> >> democratic ticket. And for the most part has shown herself to be
> >> >> level
> >> >> headed and holds to the values she ran on.
>
> >> > Palin's values:
>
> >> > * Pregnant before eloping
>
> >> > * Married to a secessionist
>
> >> > * Believes that the Founding Fathers recited the Pledge of Allegiance

> >> They DID - just not the same one we have today.

> > Ummmm....
>
> > No. They didn't.
>
> > The Pledge of Allegiance was written in about 1892.
>
> <GROAN> Did you read what I said???? Do you understand English? The
> "pledge"
> recited at the "Continental Congress" was fundamentally DIFFERENT from
> that
> of today OR 1892.

< Nice back-pedal.

Are you stupid or brain damaged? READ my ORIGINAL statement regarding
the "pledge."

INSTANT REPLAY FOR THE INTELLECTUALLY CHALLENGED

> >> > * Believes that the Founding Fathers recited the Pledge of Allegiance

> >> They DID - just not the same one we have today.

There is NO back peddling in this. They DID have a "pledge" back at the
time of the "founding fathers" just NOT the same one we have today. What
PART of that are you too confused to understand? Eh punk?
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]