• Als Spam markieren
• Beitrag melden

• 
  Diese Gruppe Alles

• Archiv
• RSS-Feeds

• Kontakt
• Hilfe
• Impressum
• Datenschutz

Re: 51 Things I'm Lying by Saying You Aren't Allowed to See on Google Maps

> "-" wrote:
>> My speed is less than DSL.

Iarnrod <iarnrod@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Then there's the problem right there. Why did you jump to the
> conclusion that your home computer's inability to load large image
> files meant someone out there was censoring anything?


That's been explained.  Google maps sends this message:
"We are sorry, but we don't have imagery at this zoom level for
this region."  That's not true at all.  Google does not report that
their actual problem is their own time-out on a bandwidth issue,
and they do not afford a feature which allows the user to change
that bandwidth time-out value.  The computer itself has no inability
because I also reported to you that there were -varying- results.



>> On one test I eventually obtained the White House at "tick 1" and can
>> detect what might be shingle shadows but no real counting available.
>> That image is fuzzy, indistinct; not caused by my high-res monitor.

> That's about as good as it gets for ANY image on "tick 1" as you call it.
> Compare that White House roof top image with the top of some house
> out in Chevy Chase. Same resolution, no fuzzying, no digital altering.


You'd think that, for a national symbol, something would have
been done to enhance the resolution of the image so that "we the
people" are not impaired in our ability to gaze respectfully and with
worship & awe at those important symbols of governmental power.



>>> I am looking on level 1 at the shingles ...

>> You said you could count them, so how many are there ?

> I am not bothering to count. That's a ridiculous question when I
> already have proven you wrong on the issue.    [ ... ]


You said that you could count the shingles.  Were you lying ?



>> We are discovering that google maps can time-out and might
>> exhibit variances due to network traffic and download speeds.

> Which isn't censorship.


So you say.  And that's why you're in the sheeple category.



> Your claim was wrong.


Claim was not mine but from a posted article by IT Security Editors.
I claim, however, that Google Maps does not tell the truth when
it cannot deliver its images to a bandwidth impaired connection,
and does not service clients who might require higher time-outs.



> All of which reflect problems with your inadequate home computer
> set-up and have nothing to do with what everyone else   ...


Everyone else?  You know of nobody who uses dial-up or shares
DSL or broadband with other demanding neighbors on the same line?
If so then your knowledge base is severely restricted and maybe faulty.



> ... The vice president's residence at the Naval Observatory is digitally
> altered on Google but not in Mapquest... It is all inconsistent.


Hmmm.  Perhaps amidst the fray "larnrod" has forgotten the topic.



-----------------------------------------------------------
<agent86@justicespammail.com> wrote:
> ...  you are quick to accuse others of lying.  Why is that?


Disingenuous.  "Larnrod" has accused others of lying, not me.



- regards
- jb

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Israel Says Stopped Arms Supplies to Georgia Prior to Conflict
http://www.wvwnews.net/story.php?idU26
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Antworten