Re: On average, 1,452 black babies are aborted every day in the United States. They cry out - Please don't vote for Obama!

"1,452 black babies are aborted every day in the United States"



SO?

With the U.S. population already out of control and expected to reach
upwards of 500 million by mid-century, the LAST THING we need are more
babies, especially those from the black and hispanic groups.

The majority of babies from these groups are destined for lives of
poverty, illiteracy, crime, and parasitic drags on the economy and
societal quality.  As they reach adulthood, these "people" generally
will not lead productive or even mildly good lives.

What we need are MANY MORE ABORTIONS from within these groups!
Otherwise, overpopulation will eventually pull the U.S. down to the
economic and quality-of-life levels of an Argentina or a Venezuela.
When the U.S. population passed 200-million some years ago, most
sociologists and demographers agreed that the country was nearing its
optimum ability to comfortably support its people.

Of course, the pope and his massive catholic cult control family non-
planning for all the spics, so we can't expect much help from those
"people."  But black females by and large(!) should be encouraged to
abort their packages, especially if the mother-to-be is under 13 --
which today includes fully 45-percent of african american baby makers.

As for the hokum 527_blew is spewing here ... (like he's the great non-
racist and humanitarian) well you know where his shit  belongs ...
sideways.

-----------------------
"How Many Americans?"

By Steven A. Camarota
Tuesday, September 2, 2008; A15


When the Census Bureau released its new population projections last
month, most of the media focused on the country's changing racial
composition. But this was almost certainly not the most important
finding. The projections show that the U.S. population will grow by
135 million in just 42 years -- a 44 percent increase. Such growth
would have profound implications for our environment and quality of
life. Most of the increase would be a direct result of one federal
policy -- immigration. If we reduced the level of immigration, the
projections would be much lower. The question we have to ask ourselves
is: Do we want to be a much more densely settled country?

Native-born Americans have only about two children on average, which
makes for a roughly stable population over time. But with an estimated
1.5 million legal and illegal immigrants settling in the country each
year, and about 900,000 births to these immigrants each year,
immigration directly and indirectly accounts for at least three-
fourths of U.S. population growth.

An increase of 135 million people by 2050 is equivalent to the entire
populations of Mexico and Canada moving here. Assuming the same ratio
of population to infrastructure that exists today, the United States
would need to build and pay for 36,000 schools. We would need to
develop enough land to accommodate 52 million new housing units, along
with places for the people who lived in them to shop and work. We
would also have to construct enough roads to handle 106 million more
vehicles.

Of course, our country can "fit" more people. But such a dramatic
increase would affect many issues about which Americans are concerned,
including the environment, traffic, congestion, sprawl and the loss of
open spaces. Technology and planning could help manage this situation,
but there is no way they could offset all of the impact of 135 million
more people. This massive increase also would have implications for
the size and scope of government; more densely settled societies
almost always are more heavily regulated societies.

Another important finding in the census projections is that, even with
record levels of immigration for the next four decades, the U.S.
population will still grow significantly older. Immigration makes our
society only slightly younger than it would otherwise be. (Consider
that, on average, the overall fertility rate in the United States is
about 2.1 children per woman. If immigrants are excluded from the
data, it's still about 2.0 children per woman. This compares with 1.4
children in Western Europe. Immigration makes for a much more densely
settled country; it does not make for a much younger country.) As the
Census Bureau stated in its 2000 projections, immigration is a "highly
inefficient" means for addressing the problem of an aging society in
the long run. The new projections show the same thing.

Some people think that immigration creates large economic benefits.
But the economic research is pretty clear: While immigration does
significantly increase economic activity in the receiving society,
almost all of that increased activity go to the immigrants themselves
in the form of wages and benefits. The gain to natives is tiny. When
the National Research Council, which is part of the National Academy
of Sciences, examined this question, it concluded that the benefits
for native-born Americans were equal to only about one- or two-tenths
of 1 percent of their income. The two economists who did the work for
the council described the effect as "minuscule."

Moreover, this tiny economic benefit was entirely erased by the fiscal
drain immigrant households imposed on taxpayers. Perhaps worst of all,
the researchers found that to generate this small gain, immigration
reduced the wages of the least educated and poorest American workers.

There is no question that immigrants benefit by coming here. But it is
difficult to argue that immigration is a well-targeted way to lift up
the world's poor. Many immigrants to the United States were not poor
in their home countries. More important, although immigration causes
an enormous increase in the overall U.S. population, it still
represents an infinitesimal fraction of the world's low-income
population. We can do more to help poor people in developing countries
through trade policies and development assistance.

The United States may well decide to continue to allow the settlement
of 1.5 million immigrants (legal and illegal) each year. But legal
immigration is a federal program like any other and could be reduced
below the 1 million currently allowed to enter annually. Greater
resources could also be devoted to reducing illegal immigration. It's
important to understand that the new projections show us one possible
future. We must decide as a country if this is the future we want.

[The writer is director of research at the Center for Immigration
Studies in Washington.]

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/01/AR2008090101714.html




---------  spew from 527_blew  -----------

http://www.blackgenocide.org/black.html

http://www.lifenews.com/nat3973.html

http://www.cbn.com/CBNnews/CWN/042106Abortion.aspx
[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]