Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit
Von: Harry Hope (rivrvu@ix.netcom.com) [Profil]
Datum: 05.11.2009 00:44
Message-ID: <q044f5h0u1o5vqofmuu2dj8kj77m4b858h@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.usa alt.politics alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.liberalismtalk.politics.misc
Datum: 05.11.2009 00:44
Message-ID: <q044f5h0u1o5vqofmuu2dj8kj77m4b858h@4ax.com>
Newsgroup: alt.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.usa alt.politics alt.fan.rush-limbaugh alt.politics.liberalismtalk.politics.misc
http://www.contracostatimes.com/celebrities/ci_13713556 11/04/2009 People: Sex tape forced Carrie Prejean to settle pageant lawsuit By Tony Hicks Contra Costa Times As you know, making a sex tape is a condition of becoming a celebrity. Even for nice religious girls. According to TMZ.com, Carrie Prejean demanded more than a million dollars during her lawsuit-settlement negotiations with the Miss California USA Pageant, that is, until the lawyer for the pageant showed Carrie an X-rated home video of herself. The video the lawyer showed Carrie is extremely graphic and has never been released publicly. TMZ obtained the video months ago but decided not to post it because it was so racy. In other words, it wasn't that great. No one is saying who else might've been involved, though TMZ hints the tape only shows Prejean. Oh ... can't you go blind from that? TMZ says Prejean essentially walked away with nothing, though the pageant will pay about $100,000 to her lawyers and publicist, which is only a fraction of her bills. ____________________________________________________________ Right Wing Family Values in Action. Harry[ Auf dieses Posting antworten ]
Antworten
- ArmyOfDorkness (05.11.2009 01:57)
- ????? ??? (05.11.2009 06:05)
- lab~rat >:-) (05.11.2009 14:51)
- Beam Me Up Scotty (05.11.2009 15:49)
- liberal2 (05.11.2009 20:53)
- Tom Sr. (05.11.2009 22:09)
- Poetic Justice (05.11.2009 22:14)
- Tom Sr. (05.11.2009 22:24)
- Hairy Hope (05.11.2009 22:48)
- B1ackwater (05.11.2009 23:30)
- liberal2 (06.11.2009 01:51)
- All the Tea in China Blue (10.11.2009 23:36)
- Jericho (07.11.2009 04:31)
- B1ackwater (08.11.2009 07:33)
- liberal2 (10.11.2009 21:13)
- M Gozler (08.11.2009 12:02)
- - (06.11.2009 12:07)
- Doug Bashford (08.11.2009 00:09)
- - (09.11.2009 11:56)
- B1ackwater (09.11.2009 21:26)
- Lars Eighner (09.11.2009 22:30)
- B1ackwater (10.11.2009 14:57)
- ArmyOfDorkness (10.11.2009 15:20)
- lab~rat >:-) (10.11.2009 15:59)
- Lamont Cranston (10.11.2009 18:00)
- B1ackwater (10.11.2009 17:30)
- Lamont Cranston (10.11.2009 18:02)
- lab~rat >:-) (10.11.2009 18:46)
- B1ackwater (10.11.2009 20:37)
- Lars Eighner (10.11.2009 16:18)
- B1ackwater (10.11.2009 17:35)
- Lamont Cranston (10.11.2009 17:58)
- lab~rat >:-) (10.11.2009 18:48)
- Gogarty (10.11.2009 19:59)
- lab~rat >:-) (10.11.2009 20:10)
- Lamont Cranston (10.11.2009 20:41)
- Catfish Hunter (10.11.2009 23:57)
- Lars Eighner (11.11.2009 01:22)
- lab~rat >:-) (11.11.2009 14:21)
- Lars Eighner (11.11.2009 18:05)
- lab~rat >:-) (11.11.2009 18:32)
- Lars Eighner (11.11.2009 21:21)
- lab~rat >:-) (12.11.2009 14:19)
- lab~rat >:-) (06.11.2009 13:36)
- Constitutional American (06.11.2009 14:00)
- lab~rat >:-) (06.11.2009 14:58)
- Constitutional American (07.11.2009 03:37)
- - (09.11.2009 11:53)
- lab~rat >:-) (09.11.2009 15:32)
- ArmyOfDorkness (09.11.2009 17:23)
- lab~rat >:-) (09.11.2009 18:41)
- lab~rat >:-) (09.11.2009 15:31)
- All the Tea in China Blue (10.11.2009 23:36)
- r wiley (07.11.2009 04:26)
- Beam Me Up Scotty (06.11.2009 16:31)
- All the Tea in China Blue (10.11.2009 23:36)
- liberal2 (11.11.2009 00:19)
- Beam Me Up Scotty (11.11.2009 01:18)
- r wiley (06.11.2009 09:02)
- Beam Me Up Scotty (06.11.2009 16:39)
- r wiley (07.11.2009 03:23)
- lorad (08.11.2009 09:57)
